The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Negative Differential Resistance in Carbon Atomic Wire-Carbon Nanotube Junctions
Abstract
Negative differential resistance (NDR) was recently observed in carbon nanotube junctions just before breaking and hypothesized to arise from the formation of monatomic carbon wires in the junction. Motivated by these results, a first-principles scattering-state approach, based on density functional theory, is used to study the transport properties of carbon chains covalently connecting metallic carbon nanotube leads at finite bias. The I- V characteristics of short carbon chains are predicted to exhibit even-odd behavior, and NDR is found for both even and odd chain junctions in our calculations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems
Datta, S. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805776 · Cited by 7,704
Cited by
Carbyne from First Principles: Chain of C Atoms, a Nanorod or a Nanorope
Liu, M., Artyukhov, V. I., Lee, H., Xu, F., & Yakobson, B. I. (2013) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn404177r · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Khoo, K. H., Neaton, J. B., Son, Y. W., Cohen, M. L., & Louie, S. G.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-08-19
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2900-2905
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W1985749205
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
