The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peeling Single-Stranded DNA from Graphite Surface to Determine Oligonucleotide Binding Energy by Force Spectroscopy
Open accessAbstract
We measured the force required to peel single-stranded DNA molecules from single-crystal graphite using chemical force microscopy. Force traces during retraction of a tip chemically modified with oligonucleotides displayed characteristic plateaus with abrupt force jumps, which we interpreted as a steady state peeling process punctuated by complete detachment of one or more molecules. We were able to differentiate between bases in pyrimidine homopolymers; peeling forces were 85.3 - 4.7 pN for polythymine and 60.8 +/- 5.5 pN for polycytosine, substantially independent of salt concentration and the rate of detachment. We developed a model for peeling a freely jointed chain from the graphite surface and estimated the average binding energy per monomer to be 11.5 +/- 0.6 k(B)T and 8.3 +/- 0.7 k(B)T in the cases of thymine and cytosine nucleotides, respectively. The equilibrium free-energy profile simulated using molecular dynamics had a potential well of 18.9 k(B)T for thymidine, showing that nonelectrostatic interactions dominate the binding. The discrepancy between the experiment and theory indicates that not all bases are adsorbed on the surface or that there is a population of conformations in which they adsorb. Force spectroscopy using oligonucleotides covalently linked to AFM tips provides a flexible and unambiguous means to quantify the strength of interactions between DNA and a number of substrates, potentially including nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Predicting DNA duplex stability from the base sequence
Breslauer, K. J., Frank, R., Blöcker, H., & Marky, L. A. (1986) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.83.11.3746 · Cited by 1,837
Cited by
Adsorption and Desorption of DNA on Graphene Oxide Studied by Fluorescently Labeled Oligonucleotides
Wu, M., Kempaiah, R., Huang, P.-J. J., Maheshwari, V., & Liu, J. (2011) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la1037926 · Cited by 527
Rapid Sequencing of Individual DNA Molecules in Graphene Nanogaps
Postma, H. W. C. (2010) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl9029237 · Cited by 375
Recognition Ability of DNA for Carbon Nanotubes Correlates with Their Binding Affinity
Roxbury, D., Tu, X., Zheng, M., & Jagota, A. (2011) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la2007793 · Cited by 104
Self-citationStructural Characteristics of Oligomeric DNA Strands Adsorbed onto Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes
Roxbury, D., Jagota, A., & Mittal, J. (2013) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp309523a · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Manohar, S., Mantz, A. R., Bancroft, K. E., Hui, C.-Y., Jagota, A., & Vezenov, D. V.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-11-08
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4365-4372
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W2023501194
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.