The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lithium Insertion In Silicon Nanowires: An ab Initio Study
Abstract
The ultrahigh specific lithium ion storage capacity of Si nanowires (SiNWs) has been demonstrated recently and has opened up exciting opportunities for energy storage. However, a systematic theoretical study on lithium insertion in SiNWs remains a challenge, and as a result, understanding of the fundamental interaction and microscopic dynamics during lithium insertion is still lacking. This paper focuses on the study of single Li atom insertion into SiNWs with different sizes and axis orientations by using full ab initio calculations. We show that the binding energy of interstitial Li increases as the SiNW diameter grows. The binding energies at different insertion sites, which can be classified as surface, intermediate, and core sites, are quite different. We find that surface sites are energetically the most favorable insertion positions and that intermediate sites are the most unfavorable insertion positions. Compared with the other growth directions, the [110] SiNWs with different diameters always present the highest binding energies on various insertion locations, which indicates that [110] SiNWs are more favorable by Li doping. Furthermore, we study Li diffusion inside SiNWs. The results show that the Li surface diffusion has a much higher chance to occur than the surface to core diffusion, which is consistent with the experimental observation that the Li insertion in SiNWs is layer by layer from surface to inner region. After overcoming a large barrier crossing surface-to-intermediate region, the diffusion toward center has a higher possibility to occur than the inverse process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods
Martin, R. M. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805769 · Cited by 1,752
Label-free immunodetection with CMOS-compatible semiconducting nanowires
Stern, E., Klemic, J. F., Routenberg, D. A., Wyrembak, P. N., Turner-Evans, D. B., Hamilton, A. D., LaVan, D. A., Fahmy, T. M., & Reed, M. A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05498 · Cited by 1,352
Cited by
Designing nanostructured Si anodes for high energy lithium ion batteries
Wu, H., & Cui, Y. (2012) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2012.08.004 · Cited by 2,350
Self-citationPrelithiated Silicon Nanowires as an Anode for Lithium Ion Batteries
Liu, N., Hu, L., McDowell, M. T., Jackson, A., & Cui, Y. (2011) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn2017167 · Cited by 578
Self-citationLi, Y., Wu, D., Zhou, Z., Cabrera, C. R., & Chen, Z. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz300792n · Cited by 445
Nanowires for Electrochemical Energy Storage
Zhou, G., Xu, L., Hu, G., Mai, L., & Cui, Y. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00326 · Cited by 439
Self-citationOuyang, L., Cao, Z., Wang, H., Hu, R., & Zhu, M. (2017) · Journal of Alloys and Compounds · doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.179 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Q., Zhang, W., Wan, W., Cui, Y., & Wang, E.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-08-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3243-3249
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W2090591291
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.