The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Designed Functional Systems from Peapod-like Co@Carbon to Co3O4@Carbon Nanocomposites
Abstract
Novel peapod-like Co@carbon and Co(3)O(4)@carbon composite nanostructures have been successfully fabricated for the first time based on rational design and elaborate analyses. The nanostructures exhibit the unique feature of Co or Co(3)O(4) nanoparticles (20 nm) encapsulated inside and well-graphitized carbon layers coating outside. The peapod-like Co@carbon and Co(3)O(4)@carbon nanostructures exhibit intriguing morphologies, architectures, and chemical compositions. What is more important, the unique morphologies, architectures, and chemical compositions will lead to perfect performances in many applications. In this paper, a good example of Li-ion battery testing is given to demonstrate the superior stability and rate capability of the Co(3)O(4)@carbon. The peapod-like nanostructure of Co(3)O(4)@carbon demonstrates very high specific capacity (around 1000 mAh/g at the charge/discharge rate of 1C) and wonderful cyclability (at least 80% retention is available when cycled back from very high charge/discharge rate of 10C) during the galvanostatic cycling, indicating it as the promising candidate for Li-ion batteries' anodes. Additionally, the excellent electrochemical performance is significantly associated with the unique architecture in the samples, which verifies the feasibility of rational design of hierarchical materials for the actual applications. Meanwhile, the Co@carbon and Co(3)O(4)@carbon nanostructures demonstrate the regular and uniform distribution of magnetic nanoparticles in well-graphitized carbon fiber, which is a great achievement in the field of monodispersing and isolating magnetic nanoparticles. The prepared samples can also be potentially applied in other fields, such as gene delivery, catalysis, and magnetism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jin, H., Wang, J., Su, D., Wei, Z., Pang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja5127165 · Cited by 1,765
Self-citationZhao, Y., Wang, L. P., Sougrati, M. T., Feng, Z., Leconte, Y., Fisher, A., Srinivasan, M., & Xu, Z. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201601424 · Cited by 586
Peng, C., Chen, B., Qin, Y., Yang, S., Li, C., Zuo, Y., Liu, S., & Yang, J. (2012) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn202888d · Cited by 508
Liu, X., Park, M., Kim, M. G., Gupta, S., Wu, G., & Cho, J. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201503612 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Zhang, H. J., Lu, L., Stubbs, L. P., Wong, C. C., & Lin, J.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-07-28
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4753-4761
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2082840843
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Designed Functional Systems from Peapod-like Co@Carbon to Co3O4@Carbon Nanocomposites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/nn1004183
- The paper
- Wang, Y., Zhang, H. J., Lu, L., Stubbs, L. P., Wong, C. C., & Lin, J. (2010). Designed Functional Systems from Peapod-like Co@Carbon to Co3O4@Carbon Nanocomposites. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1004183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.