The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Metallization of Branched DNA Origami for Nanoelectronic Circuit Fabrication
Abstract
This work examines the metallization of folded DNA, known as DNA origami, as an enabling step toward the use of such DNA as templates for nanoelectronic circuits. DNA origami, a simple and robust method for creating a wide variety of shapes and patterns, makes possible the increased complexity and flexibility needed for both the design and assembly of useful circuit templates. In addition, selective metallization of the DNA template is essential for circuit fabrication. Metallization of DNA origami presents several challenges over and above those associated with the metallization of other DNA templates such as λ-DNA. These challenges include (1) the stability of the origami in the processes used for metallization, (2) the enhanced selectivity required to metallize small origami structures, (3) the increased difficulty of adhering small structures to the surface so that they will not be removed when subject to multiple metallization steps, and (4) the influence of excess staple strands present with the origami. This paper describes our efforts to understand and address these challenges. Specifically, the influence of experimental conditions on template stability and on the selectivity of metal deposition was investigated for small DNA origami templates. These templates were seeded with Ag and then plated with Au via an electroless deposition process. Both staple strand concentration and the concentration of ions in solution were found to have a significant impact. Selective continuous metal deposition was achieved, with an average metallized height as small as 32 nm. The shape of branched origami was also retained after metallization. These results represent important progress toward the realization of DNA-templated nanocircuits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Challenges and opportunities for structural DNA nanotechnology
Pinheiro, A. V., Han, D., Shih, W. M., & Yan, H. (2011) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.187 · Cited by 1,292
Biswas, A., Bayer, I. S., Biris, A. S., Wang, T., Dervishi, E., & Faupel, F. (2012) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2011.11.001 · Cited by 909
Chemistries for DNA Nanotechnology
Madsen, M., & Gothelf, K. V. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00570 · Cited by 447
Single-Step Rapid Assembly of DNA Origami Nanostructures for Addressable Nanoscale Bioreactors
Fu, Y., Zeng, D., Chao, J., Jin, Y., Zhang, Z., Liu, H., Li, D., Ma, H., Huang, Q., Gothelf, K. V., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja3076692 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, J., Geng, Y., Pound, E., Gyawali, S., Ashton, J. R., Hickey, J., Woolley, A. T., & Harb, J. N.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-02-16
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2240-2247
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2326060479
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metallization of Branched DNA Origami for Nanoelectronic Circuit Fabrication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/nn1035075
- The paper
- Liu, J., Geng, Y., Pound, E., Gyawali, S., Ashton, J. R., Hickey, J., Woolley, A. T., & Harb, J. N. (2011). Metallization of Branched DNA Origami for Nanoelectronic Circuit Fabrication. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1035075
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.