The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon Nanotube Wiring of Electrodes for High-Rate Lithium Batteries Using an Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquid Precursor as Dispersant and Binder: A Case Study on Iron Fluoride Nanoparticles
Abstract
To meet the energy and power demands of lithium-based batteries, numerous nanostructured and -decorated material prototypes have been proposed. In particular for insulating electrodes, a decrease of grain size coupled with wiring by a conductive phase is quite effective in improving the electroactivity. In this work, we report a novel electron-wiring method using single-wall carbon nanotubes in an imidazolium-based ionic liquid precursor, which enables them to be well disentangled and dispersed, even unzipped. As a case study, in situ formed iron fluoride nanoparticles (∼10 nm) are collected into micrometer-sized aggregates after wiring of merely 5 wt % carbon nanotubes in weight. These composite materials act as cathodes and exhibit a remarkable improvement of capacity and rate performances (e.g., 220 mAh/g at 0.1C and 80 mAh/g at 10C) due to the construction of mixed conductive networks. Therein, the ionic liquid remainder also serves as an in situ binder to generate a nanographene-coated fluoride, which can even run well without the addition of extra conductive carbon and binder. This nanotechnological procedure based on an ionic liquid succeeds without applying high temperature and pressure and is a significant step forward in developing high-power lithium batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Narrow graphene nanoribbons from carbon nanotubes
Jiao, L., Zhang, L., Wang, X., Diankov, G., & Dai, H. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07919 · Cited by 2,441
Cited by
Ionic liquids and derived materials for lithium and sodium batteries
Yang, Q., Zhang, Z., Sun, X.-G., Hu, Y.-S., Xing, H., & Dai, S. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00464h · Cited by 601
Shin, J.-Y., Joo, J. H., Samuelis, D., & Maier, J. (2012) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm2031009 · Cited by 401
Self-citationMaterials for Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Batteries
Hayner, C. M., Zhao, X., & Kung, H. H. (2012) · Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-062011-081024 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, C., Gu, L., Tong, J., & Maier, J.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-03-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2930-2938
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2315036664
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.