The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High Content Screening in Zebrafish Speeds up Hazard Ranking of Transition Metal Oxide Nanoparticles
Open accessAbstract
Zebrafish is an aquatic organism that can be used for high content safety screening of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). We demonstrate, for the first time, the use of high content bright-field and fluorescence-based imaging to compare the toxicological effect of transition metal oxide (CuO, ZnO, NiO, and Co(3)O(4)) nanoparticles in zebrafish embryos and larvae. High content bright-field imaging demonstrated potent and dose-dependent hatching interference in the embryos, with the exception of Co(3)O(4) which was relatively inert. We propose that the hatching interference was due to the shedding of Cu and Ni ions, compromising the activity of the hatching enzyme, ZHE1, similar to what we previously proposed for Zn(2+). This hypothesis is based on the presence of metal-sensitive histidines in the catalytic center of this enzyme. Co-introduction of a metal ion chelator, diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA), reversed the hatching interference of Cu, Zn, and Ni. While neither the embryos nor larvae demonstrated morphological abnormalities, high content fluorescence-based imaging demonstrated that CuO, ZnO, and NiO could induce increased expression of the heat shock protein 70:enhanced green fluorescence protein (hsp70:eGFP) in transgenic zebrafish larvae. Induction of this response by CuO required a higher nanoparticle dose than the amount leading to hatching interference. This response was also DTPA-sensitive. We demonstrate that high content imaging of embryo development, morphological abnormalities, and HSP70 expression can be used for hazard ranking and determining the dose-response relationships leading to ENM effects on the development of the zebrafish embryo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of metal ions
Stohs, S. J., & Bagchi, D. (1995) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/0891-5849(94)00159-h · Cited by 4,219
637. The stability of transition-metal complexes
Irving, H., & Williams, R. J. P. (1953) · Journal of the Chemical Society (Resumed) · doi:10.1039/jr9530003192 · Cited by 2,116
Cited by
Pure and multi metal oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, antibacterial and cytotoxic properties
Stankic, S., Suman, S., Haque, F., & Vidic, J. (2016) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-016-0225-6 · Cited by 678
Nel, A., Xia, T., Meng, H., Wang, X., Lin, S., Ji, Z., & Zhang, H. (2013) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar300022h · Cited by 579
Self-citationZebrafish: A complete animal model to enumerate the nanoparticle toxicity
Chakraborty, C., Sharma, A. R., Sharma, G., & Lee, S.-S. (2016) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-016-0217-6 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, S., Zhao, Y., Xia, T., Meng, H., Ji, Z., Liu, R., George, S., Xiong, S., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Pokhrel, S., Mädler, L., Damoiseaux, R., Lin, S., & Nel, A. E.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-08-25
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 7284-7295
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2100049001
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.