The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wetting and Interfacial Properties of Water Nanodroplets in Contact with Graphene and Monolayer Boron–Nitride Sheets
Abstract
Born-Oppenheim quantum molecular dynamics (QMD) simulations are performed to investigate wetting, diffusive, and interfacial properties of water nanodroplets in contact with a graphene sheet or a monolayer boron-nitride (BN) sheet. Contact angles of the water nanodroplets on the two sheets are computed for the first time using QMD simulations. Structural and dynamic properties of the water droplets near the graphene or BN sheet are also studied to gain insights into the interfacial interaction between the water droplet and the substrate. QMD simulation results are compared with those from previous classic MD simulations and with the experimental measurements. The QMD simulations show that the graphene sheet yields a contact angle of 87°, while the monolayer BN sheet gives rise to a contact angle of 86°. Hence, like graphene, the monolayer BN sheet is also weakly hydrophobic, even though the BN bonds entail a large local dipole moment. QMD simulations also show that the interfacial water can induce net positive charges on the contacting surface of the graphene and monolayer BN sheets, and such charge induction may affect electronic structure of the contacting graphene in view that graphene is a semimetal. Contact angles of nanodroplets of water in a supercooled state on the graphene are also computed. It is found that under the supercooled condition, water nanodroplets exhibit an appreciably larger contact angle than under the ambient condition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Thermal Conductance of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Interfaces
Ge, Z., Cahill, D. G., & Braun, P. V. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.186101 · Cited by 455
Fluidity of Hydration Layers Nanoconfined between Mica Surfaces
Leng, Y., & Cummings, P. T. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.026101 · Cited by 200
Cited by
Wettability effect on nanoconfined water flow
Wu, K., Chen, Z., Li, J., Li, X., Xu, J., & Dong, X. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1612608114 · Cited by 567
What Is the Contact Angle of Water on Graphene?
Taherian, F., Marcon, V., van der Vegt, N. F. A., & Leroy, F. (2013) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la304645w · Cited by 502
Boron nitride nanomaterials: biocompatibility and bio-applications
Merlo, A., Mokkapati, V. R. S. S., Pandit, S., & Mijakovic, I. (2018) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/c8bm00516h · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, H., & Zeng, X. C.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-02-22
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2401-2409
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2065350946
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.