The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effect of Nanoparticle Polyethylene Glycol Surface Density on Ligand-Directed Tumor Targeting Studied in Vivo by Dual Modality Imaging
Open accessAbstract
The development and application of nanoparticles as in vivo delivery vehicles for therapeutic and/or diagnostic agents has seen a drastic growth over the last decades. Novel imaging techniques allow real-time in vivo study of nanoparticle accumulation kinetics at the level of the cell and targeted tissue. Successful intravenous application of such nanocarriers requires a hydrophilic particle surface coating, of which polyethylene glycol (PEG) has become the most widely studied and applied. In the current study, the effect of nanoparticle PEG surface density on the targeting efficiency of ligand-functionalized nanoemulsions was investigated. We synthesized 100 nm nanoemulsions with a PEG surface density varying from 5 to 50 mol %. Fluorescent and paramagnetic lipids were included to allow their multimodal detection, while RGD peptides were conjugated to the PEG coating to obtain specificity for the α(v)β(3)-integrin. The development of a unique experimental imaging setup allowed us to study, in real time, nanoparticle accumulation kinetics at (sub)-cellular resolution in tumors that were grown in a window chamber model with confocal microscopy imaging, and at the macroscopic tumor level in subcutaneously grown xenografts with magnetic resonance imaging. Accumulation in the tumor occurred more rapidly for the targeted nanoemulsions than for the nontargeted versions, and the PEG surface density had a strong effect on nanoparticle targeting efficiency. Counterintuitively, yet consistent with the PEG density conformation models, the highest specificity and targeting efficiency was observed at a low PEG surface density.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanoemulsion: Concepts, development and applications in drug delivery
Singh, Y., Meher, J. G., Raval, K., Khan, F. A., Chaurasia, M., Jain, N. K., & Chourasia, M. K. (2017) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.008 · Cited by 1,358
Mendes, B. B., Conniot, J., Avital, A., Yao, D., Jiang, X., Zhou, X., Sharf-Pauker, N., Xiao, Y., Adir, O., Liang, H., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00104-y · Cited by 719
Xu, Q., Ensign, L. M., Boylan, N. J., Schön, A., Gong, X., Yang, J.-C., Lamb, N. W., Cai, S., Yu, T., Freire, E., et al. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b03876 · Cited by 568
Shaping Cancer Nanomedicine: The Effect of Particle Shape on The In Vivo Journey of Nanoparticles
Toy, R., Peiris, P. M., Ghaghada, K. B., & Karathanasis, E. (2014) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/nnm.13.191 · Cited by 570
Khalin, I., Heimburger, D., Melnychuk, N., Collot, M., Groschup, B., Hellal, F., Reisch, A., Plesnila, N., & Klymchenko, A. S. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c01505 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Hak, S., Helgesen, E., Hektoen, H. H., Huuse, E. M., Jarzyna, P. A., Mulder, W. J. M., Haraldseth, O., & Davies, C. D. L.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-06-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 5648-5658
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2042949277
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of Nanoparticle Polyethylene Glycol Surface Density on Ligand-Directed Tumor Targeting Studied in Vivo by Dual Modality Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/nn301630n
- The paper
- Hak, S., Helgesen, E., Hektoen, H. H., Huuse, E. M., Jarzyna, P. A., Mulder, W. J. M., Haraldseth, O., & Davies, C. D. L. (2012). The Effect of Nanoparticle Polyethylene Glycol Surface Density on Ligand-Directed Tumor Targeting Studied in Vivo by Dual Modality Imaging. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn301630n
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.