The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peptide Adsorption on Silica Nanoparticles: Evidence of Hydrophobic Interactions
Abstract
Molecular recognition and interactions at the interface between biomolecules and inorganic materials determine important phenomena such as protein adsorption, cell adhesion to biomaterials, or the selective response of biosensors. Events occurring at the biomolecule-inorganic interface, despite their importance, are still poorly understood, thus limiting control of interfacial properties and response. In this contribution, using well-characterized silica nanoparticles and a series of peptides having heterogeneous physicochemical properties (S1: KLPGWSG, S2: AFILPTG, and S3: LDHSLHS) identified from biopanning against the same particles, we identify the driving forces that govern peptide-silica binding. Binding isotherms obtained by fluorimetric assay under different pH conditions allowed us to demonstrate the impact of binding environment (pH) on adsorption behavior of a given peptide-surface silica nanoparticle. Our experimental data suggest a multistep adsorption mechanism leading to the formation of multilayers on silica, in which the prevailing interactions (i.e., electrostatic or hydrophobic/hydrogen bonding) and their relative contribution to the binding event are governed by the identity of the peptide itself, the substrate's surface functionality (hydrophilic or hydrophobic), and the peptide bulk concentration and solution bulk pH. Our studies show how it is possible to modulate peptide uptake on silica, or in fact on any particle, by changing either the surface properties or, more simply, the binding environment. In addition, the data reveal an intrinsic bias toward positively charged sequences in the elution conditions used in the biopanning protocol with much information about strong binder sequence diversity being lost during panning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meng, M., Stievano, L., & Lambert, J.-F. (2004) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la035336b · Cited by 169
Cited by
Nanoparticle decoration with surfactants: Molecular interactions, assembly, and applications
Heinz, H., Pramanik, C., Heinz, O., Ding, Y., Mishra, R. K., Marchon, D., Flatt, R. J., Estrela-Lopis, I., Llop, J., Moya, S., et al. (2017) · Surface Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.surfrep.2017.02.001 · Cited by 608
Emami, F. S., Puddu, V., Berry, R. J., Varshney, V., Patwardhan, S. V., Perry, C. C., & Heinz, H. (2014) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm500365c · Cited by 567
Self-citationChemical and Biophysical Signatures of the Protein Corona in Nanomedicine
Ren, J., Andrikopoulos, N., Velonia, K., Tang, H., Cai, R., Ding, F., Ke, P. C., & Chen, C. (2022) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.2c02277 · Cited by 284
Castro, M. O., de Santiago, M. Q., Nascimento, K. S., Sousa Cavada, B., de Castro Miguel, E., de Paula, A. J., & Ferreira, O. P. (2017) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-017-1441-7 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Puddu, V., & Perry, C. C.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-07-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 6356-6363
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2334819935
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peptide Adsorption on Silica Nanoparticles: Evidence of Hydrophobic Interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/nn301866q
- The paper
- Puddu, V., & Perry, C. C. (2012). Peptide Adsorption on Silica Nanoparticles: Evidence of Hydrophobic Interactions. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn301866q
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.