The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon-Layer-Protected Cuprous Oxide Nanowire Arrays for Efficient Water Reduction
Open accessAbstract
In this work, we propose a solution-based carbon precursor coating and subsequent carbonization strategy to form a thin protective carbon layer on unstable semiconductor nanostructures as a solution to the commonly occurring photocorrosion problem of many semiconductors. A proof-of-concept is provided by using glucose as the carbon precursor to form a protective carbon coating onto cuprous oxide (Cu₂O) nanowire arrays which were synthesized from copper mesh. The carbon-layer-protected Cu₂O nanowire arrays exhibited remarkably improved photostability as well as considerably enhanced photocurrent density. The Cu₂O nanowire arrays coated with a carbon layer of 20 nm thickness were found to give an optimal water splitting performance, producing a photocurrent density of -3.95 mA cm⁻² and an optimal photocathode efficiency of 0.56% under illumination of AM 1.5G (100 mW cm⁻²). This is the highest value ever reported for a Cu₂O-based electrode coated with a metal/co-catalyst-free protective layer. The photostability, measured as the percentage of the photocurrent density at the end of 20 min measurement period relative to that at the beginning of the measurement, improved from 12.6% on the bare, nonprotected Cu₂O nanowire arrays to 80.7% on the continuous carbon coating protected ones, more than a 6-fold increase. We believe that the facile strategy presented in this work is a general approach that can address the stability issue of many nonstable photoelectrodes and thus has the potential to make a meaningful contribution in the general field of energy conversion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode
FUJISHIMA, A., & HONDA, K. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/238037a0 · Cited by 34,169
Semiconductor-based Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation
Chen, X., Shen, S., Guo, L., & Mao, S. S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1001645 · Cited by 7,876
Cited by
Wang, Y., Zhou, W., Jia, R., Yu, Y., & Zhang, B. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201915992 · Cited by 1,641
A critical review of CO2 photoconversion: Catalysts and reactors
Li, K., An, X., Park, K. H., Khraisheh, M., & Tang, J. (2014) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2013.12.006 · Cited by 677
Finding the Way to Solar Fuels with Dye-Sensitized Photoelectrosynthesis Cells
Brennaman, M. K., Dillon, R. J., Alibabaei, L., Gish, M. K., Dares, C. J., Ashford, D. L., House, R. L., Meyer, G. J., Papanikolas, J. M., & Meyer, T. J. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b06466 · Cited by 369
Meng, N., Ma, X., Wang, C., Wang, Y., Yang, R., Shao, J., Huang, Y., Xu, Y., Zhang, B., & Yu, Y. (2022) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c01177 · Cited by 322
Water Splitting Progress in Tandem Devices: Moving Photolysis beyond Electrolysis
Zhang, K., Ma, M., Li, P., Wang, D. H., & Park, J. H. (2016) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201600602 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Z., Dua, R., Zhang, L., Zhu, H., Zhang, H., & Wang, P.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-02-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1709-1717
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2326423015
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.