The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cell Membranes Open “Doors” for Cationic Nanoparticles/Biomolecules: Insights into Uptake Kinetics
Abstract
Cationic nanoparticles (NPs) and cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) can enter cells in an energy-independent fashion, escaping the traditional endocytosis route, which is known as direct translocation. This unconventional entry, usually complementary to endocytosis, features rapid uptake and thus makes both cationic NPs and CPPs fascinating intracellular delivery agents. However, the mechanisms of the direct translocation of both cationic NPs and CPPs across cell membranes into the cytosol are not understood. Moreover, the relationship between direct translocation and endocytosis is also unclear. Here, using coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations we show that a model cell membrane generates a nanoscale hole to assist the spontaneous translocation of cationic gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as well as HIV-1 Tat peptides to the cytoplasm side under a transmembrane (TM) potential. After translocation, the AuNPs/Tat peptides move freely in the "cytoplasm" region and the membrane reseals itself within a microsecond, while the TM potential is strongly diminished. Furthermore, we show that the shape of the cationic object is crucial in determining if it can translocate or not across. The results provide insights into the uptake kinetics of cationic NPs/CPPs, which features the relationship between direction translocation and endocytosis. The mechanism put forward here establishes fundamental principles of the intracellular delivery of cationic nanocarriers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Doherty, G. J., & McMahon, H. T. (2009) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.081307.110540 · Cited by 3,075
Coarse Grained Model for Semiquantitative Lipid Simulations
Marrink, S. J., de Vries, A. H., & Mark, A. E. (2004) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp036508g · Cited by 2,257
Cited by
Physical Principles of Nanoparticle Cellular Endocytosis
Zhang, S., Gao, H., & Bao, G. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b03184 · Cited by 1,103
Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Drug Discovery and Pharmaceutical Development
Salo-Ahen, O. M. H., Alanko, I., Bhadane, R., Bonvin, A. M. J. J., Honorato, R. V., Hossain, S., Juffer, A. H., Kabedev, A., Lahtela-Kakkonen, M., Larsen, A. S., et al. (2020) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr9010071 · Cited by 659
Versatile Types of Organic/Inorganic Nanohybrids: From Strategic Design to Biomedical Applications
Zhao, N., Yan, L., Zhao, X., Chen, X., Li, A., Zheng, D., Zhou, X., Dai, X., & Xu, F.-J. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00401 · Cited by 429
Bergami, E., Pugnalini, S., Vannuccini, M. L., Manfra, L., Faleri, C., Savorelli, F., Dawson, K. A., & Corsi, I. (2017) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.06.008 · Cited by 423
Entry of nanoparticles into cells: the importance of nanoparticle properties
Zhao, J., & Stenzel, M. H. (2018) · Polymer Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c7py01603d · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, J., & Alexander-Katz, A.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-11-26
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 10799-10808
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2316636592
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.