The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Core–Shell Lanthanide Upconversion Nanophosphors as Four-Modal Probes for Tumor Angiogenesis Imaging
Abstract
Multimodality imaging overcomes the shortage and incorporates the advantages of different imaging tools. Lanthanide-based nanoprobes are unique and have rich optical, magnetic, radioactive, and X-ray attenuation properties; however, simple doping of different lanthanide cations into one host can result in a material with multifunction but not the optimized properties. In this study, using NaLuF4:Yb,Tm as the core and 4 nm of (153)Sm(3+)-doped NaGdF4 (half-life of (153)Sm = 46.3 h) as the shell, we developed a lanthanide-based core-shell nanocomposite as an optimized multimodal imaging probe with enhanced imaging ability. The lifetime of upconversion luminescence (UCL) at 800 nm and relaxation rate (1/T1) were at 1044 μs and 18.15 s(-1)·mM(-1), respectively; however, no significant decrease in the attenuation coefficient was observed, which preserved the excellent X-ray imaging ability. The nanomaterial NaLuF4:Yb,Tm@NaGdF4((153)Sm) was confirmed to be effective and applicable for UCL imaging, X-ray computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in vivo. Furthermore, the NaLuF4:Yb,Tm@NaGdF4((153)Sm) nanoparticles were applied in tumor angiogenesis analysis by combining multimodality imaging of CT, SPECT, and confocal UCL imaging, which shows its value of multifunctional nanoparticles NaLuF4:Yb,Tm@NaGdF4((153)Sm) in tumor angiogenesis imaging.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multimodality Imaging Probes: Design and Challenges
Louie, A. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9003538 · Cited by 1,044
Cited by
Upconversion Nanoparticles: Design, Nanochemistry, and Applications in Theranostics
Chen, G., Qiu, H., Prasad, P. N., & Chen, X. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400425h · Cited by 2,699
Nanochemistry and Nanomedicine for Nanoparticle-based Diagnostics and Therapy
Chen, G., Roy, I., Yang, C., & Prasad, P. N. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00148 · Cited by 1,499
Rare-Earth Doping in Nanostructured Inorganic Materials
Zheng, B., Fan, J., Chen, B., Qin, X., Wang, J., Wang, F., Deng, R., & Liu, X. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00644 · Cited by 1,204
Current advances in lanthanide ion (Ln3+)-based upconversion nanomaterials for drug delivery
Yang, D., Ma, P., Hou, Z., Cheng, Z., Li, C., & Lin, J. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00155a · Cited by 743
Precise nanomedicine for intelligent therapy of cancer
Chen, H., Gu, Z., An, H., Chen, C., Chen, J., Cui, R., Chen, S., Chen, W., Chen, X., Chen, X., et al. (2018) · Science China Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s11426-018-9397-5 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, Y., Zhu, X., Peng, J., & Li, F.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-11-13
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 11290-11300
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2328206562
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.