The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graphene Networks Anchored with Sn@Graphene as Lithium Ion Battery Anode
Abstract
A facile and scalable in situ chemical vapor deposition (CVD) technique using metal precursors as a catalyst and a three-dimensional (3D) self-assembly of NaCl particles as a template is developed for one-step fabrication of 3D porous graphene networks anchored with Sn nanoparticles (5-30 nm) encapsulated with graphene shells of about 1 nm (Sn@G-PGNWs) as a superior lithium ion battery anode. In the constructed architecture, the CVD-synthesized graphene shells with excellent elasticity can effectively not only avoid the direct exposure of encapsulated Sn to the electrolyte and preserve the structural and interfacial stabilization of Sn nanoparticles but also suppress the aggregation of Sn nanoparticles and buffer the volume expansion, while the interconnected 3D porous graphene networks with high electrical conductivity, large surface area, and high mechanical flexibility tightly pin the core-shell structure of Sn@G and thus lead to remarkably enhanced electrical conductivity and structural integrity of the overall electrode. As a consequence, this 3D hybrid anode exhibits very high rate performance (1022 mAh/g at 0.2 C, 865 mAh/g at 0.5 C, 780 mAh/g at 1 C, 652 mAh/g at 2 C, 459 mAh/g at 5 C, and 270 mAh/g at 10 C, 1 C = 1 A/g) and extremely long cycling stability even at high rates (a high capacity of 682 mAh/g is achieved at 2 A/g and is maintained approximately 96.3% after 1000 cycles). As far as we know, this is the best rate capacity and longest cycle life ever reported for a Sn-based lithium ion battery anode.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Cited by
Electrochemistry of Graphene and Related Materials
Ambrosi, A., Chua, C. K., Bonanni, A., & Pumera, M. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500023c · Cited by 1,208
MoS2 Nanosheets Vertically Grown on Graphene Sheets for Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes
Teng, Y., Zhao, H., Zhang, Z., Li, Z., Xia, Q., Zhang, Y., Zhao, L., Du, X., Du, Z., Lv, P., et al. (2016) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b03683 · Cited by 545
3D Graphene‐Based H2‐Production Photocatalyst and Electrocatalyst
Kuang, P., Sayed, M., Fan, J., Cheng, B., & Yu, J. (2020) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201903802 · Cited by 302
Meng, T., Zheng, L., Qin, J., Zhao, D., & Cao, M. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c7ta05946a · Cited by 128
Self-citationAluminum: An underappreciated anode material for lithium-ion batteries
Chang, X., Xie, Z., Liu, Z., Zheng, X., Zheng, J., & Li, X. (2020) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2019.10.027 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Qin, J., He, C., Zhao, N., Wang, Z., Shi, C., Liu, E.-Z., & Li, J.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-01-13
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1728-1738
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2333141836
- Cited by
- 654
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 48.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graphene Networks Anchored with Sn@Graphene as Lithium Ion Battery Anode. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/nn406105n
- The paper
- Qin, J., He, C., Zhao, N., Wang, Z., Shi, C., Liu, E.-Z., & Li, J. (2014). Graphene Networks Anchored with Sn@Graphene as Lithium Ion Battery Anode. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn406105n
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.