The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sulfur Cathodes with Hydrogen Reduced Titanium Dioxide Inverse Opal Structure
Abstract
Sulfur is a cathode material for lithium-ion batteries with a high specific capacity of 1675 mAh/g. The rapid capacity fading, however, presents a significant challenge for the practical application of sulfur cathodes. Two major approaches that have been developed to improve the sulfur cathode performance include (a) fabricating nanostructured conductive matrix to physically encapsulate sulfur and (b) engineering chemical modification to enhance binding with polysulfides and, thus, to reduce their dissolution. Here, we report a three-dimensional (3D) electrode structure to achieve both sulfur physical encapsulation and polysulfides binding simultaneously. The electrode is based on hydrogen reduced TiO2 with an inverse opal structure that is highly conductive and robust toward electrochemical cycling. The relatively enclosed 3D structure provides an ideal architecture for sulfur and polysulfides confinement. The openings at the top surface allow sulfur infusion into the inverse opal structure. In addition, chemical tuning of the TiO2 composition through hydrogen reduction was shown to enhance the specific capacity and cyclability of the cathode. With such TiO2 encapsulated sulfur structure, the sulfur cathode could deliver a high specific capacity of ∼1100 mAh/g in the beginning, with a reversible capacity of ∼890 mAh/g after 200 cycles of charge/discharge at a C/5 rate. The Coulombic efficiency was also maintained at around 99.5% during cycling. The results showed that inverse opal structure of hydrogen reduced TiO2 represents an effective strategy in improving lithium sulfur batteries performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Electrode Degradation in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Pender, J. P., Jha, G., Youn, D. H., Ziegler, J. M., Andoni, I., Choi, E. J., Heller, A., Dunn, B. S., Weiss, P. S., Penner, R. M., et al. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b04365 · Cited by 873
Tao, X., Wang, J., Ying, Z., Cai, Q., Zheng, G., Gan, Y., Huang, H., Xia, Y., Liang, C., Zhang, W., et al. (2014) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl502331f · Cited by 687
Self-citationSeh, Z. W., Yu, J. H., Li, W., Hsu, P.-C., Wang, H., Sun, Y., Yao, H., Zhang, Q., & Cui, Y. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6017 · Cited by 600
Self-citationNanowires for Electrochemical Energy Storage
Zhou, G., Xu, L., Hu, G., Mai, L., & Cui, Y. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00326 · Cited by 439
Self-citationMulti-shelled metal oxides prepared via an anion-adsorption mechanism for lithium-ion batteries
Wang, J., Tang, H., Zhang, L., Ren, H., Yu, R., Jin, Q., Qi, J., Mao, D., Yang, M., Wang, Y., et al. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.50 · Cited by 432
Metadata
- Authors
- Liang, Z., Zheng, G., Li, W., Seh, Z. W., Yao, H., Yan, K., Kong, D., & Cui, Y.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-05-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 5249-5256
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2327046259
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sulfur Cathodes with Hydrogen Reduced Titanium Dioxide Inverse Opal Structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/nn501308m
- The paper
- Liang, Z., Zheng, G., Li, W., Seh, Z. W., Yao, H., Yan, K., Kong, D., & Cui, Y. (2014). Sulfur Cathodes with Hydrogen Reduced Titanium Dioxide Inverse Opal Structure. ACS Nano. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn501308m
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.