The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of Size, Surface, Cell Line, and Kinetic Properties on the Specific Binding of A33 Antigen-Targeted Multilayered Particles and Capsules to Colorectal Cancer Cells
Open accessAbstract
There has been increased interest in the use of polymer capsules formed by the layer-by-layer (LbL) technique as therapeutic carriers to cancer cells due to their versatility and ease of surface modification. We have investigated the influence of size, surface properties, cell line, and kinetic parameters such as dosage (particle concentration) and incubation time on the specific binding of humanized A33 monoclonal antibody (huA33 mAb)-coated LbL particles and capsules to colorectal cancer cells. HuA33 mAb binds to the A33 antigen present on almost all colorectal cancer cells and has demonstrated great promise in clinical trials as an immunotherapeutic agent for cancer therapy. Flow cytometry experiments showed the cell binding specificity of huA33 mAb-coated particles to be size-dependent, with the optimal size for enhanced selectivity at approximately 500 nm. The specific binding was improved by increasing the dosage of particles incubated with the cells. The level of specific versus nonspecific binding was compared for particles terminated with various polyelectrolytes to examine the surface dependency of antibody attachment and subsequent cell binding ability. The specific binding of huA33 mAb-coated particles is also reported for two colorectal cancer cell lines, with an enhanced binding ratio between 4 and 10 obtained for the huA33 mAb-functionalized particles. This investigation aims to improve the level of specific targeting of LbL particles, which is important in targeted drug and gene delivery applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yin Win, K., & Feng, S.-S. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.050 · Cited by 1,452
Cited by
He, C., Hu, Y., Yin, L., Tang, C., & Yin, C. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.065 · Cited by 2,607
Treating metastatic cancer with nanotechnology
Schroeder, A., Heller, D. A., Winslow, M. M., Dahlman, J. E., Pratt, G. W., Langer, R., Jacks, T., & Anderson, D. G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3180 · Cited by 1,159
Size Effect on Cell Uptake in Well‐Suspended, Uniform Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles
Lu, F., Wu, S., Hung, Y., & Mou, C. (2009) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.200900005 · Cited by 1,041
Bioapplications of RAFT Polymerization
Boyer, C., Bulmus, V., Davis, T. P., Ladmiral, V., Liu, J., & Perrier, S. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9001403 · Cited by 1,015
Stimuli-responsive LbL capsules and nanoshells for drug delivery
Delcea, M., Möhwald, H., & Skirtach, A. G. (2011) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2011.03.010 · Cited by 685
Metadata
- Authors
- Cortez, C., Tomaskovic-Crook, E., Johnston, A. P. R., Scott, A. M., Nice, E. C., Heath, J. K., & Caruso, F.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-08-14
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 93-102
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2038914834
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.