The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Comparative Study on Anti-Inflammatory Activities of the Enantiomers, Shikonin and Alkannin
Abstract
A pharmacological comparison between the enantiomers, shikonin (R) and alkannin (S), was made with regard to their inhibitory effects on the increased capillary permeability and thermal edema in rats, using phenylbutazone as a positive control in both models. The results of experiments have shown that there is no significant difference in the anti-inflammatory activity between the two compounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cellular pharmacology studies of shikonin derivatives
Chen, X., Yang, L., Oppenheim, J. J., & Howard, O. M. Z. (2002) · Phytotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/ptr.1100 · Cited by 401
Inhibiting aerobic glycolysis suppresses renal interstitial fibroblast activation and renal fibrosis
Ding, H., Jiang, L., Xu, J., Bai, F., Zhou, Y., Yuan, Q., Luo, J., Zen, K., & Yang, J. (2017) · American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00036.2017 · Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- Tanaka, S., Tajima, M., Tsukada, M., & Tabata, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Natural Products
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1986-05
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 466-469
- ISSN
- 0163-3864 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6025
- OpenAlex
- W2030945380
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparative Study on Anti-Inflammatory Activities of the Enantiomers, Shikonin and Alkannin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/np50045a014
- The paper
- Tanaka, S., Tajima, M., Tsukada, M., & Tabata, M. (1986). A Comparative Study on Anti-Inflammatory Activities of the Enantiomers, Shikonin and Alkannin. Journal of Natural Products. https://doi.org/10.1021/np50045a014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
