The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Highly Selective Pyrophosphate Sensor Based on ESIPT Turn-On in Water
Abstract
Pyrophosphate (PPi) is a biologically important target. A binuclear system 3•2Zn is found to selectively recognize PPi, leading to a ratiometric fluorescent sensor at pH 7.4 in water. The binding event triggered a large fluorescence response (∼100 nm bathochromic shift) by turning on the excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT). Detection of PPi released from a PCR experiment indicated that this new probe could be a useful tool in bioanalytical applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An indirect approach for anion detection: the displacement strategy and its application
Lou, X., Ou, D., Li, Q., & Li, Z. (2012) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c2cc33158f · Cited by 272
Rapid Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide Based on Aggregation Induced Ratiometric Fluorescence Change
Li, G., Zhu, D., Liu, Q., Xue, L., & Jiang, H. (2013) · Organic Letters · doi:10.1021/ol4000845 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, W.-H., Xing, Y., & Pang, Y.
- Venue
- Organic Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-02-21
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1362-1365
- ISSN
- 1523-7052 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-7060
- OpenAlex
- W2327393433
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
