Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structure and Bonding of the Transition-Metal Carbonyl Complexes M(CO)5L (M = Cr, Mo, W) and M(CO)3L (M = Ni, Pd, Pt; L = CO, SiO, CS, N2, NO+, CN-, NC-, HCCH, CCH2, CH2, CF2, H2)1

Ehlers, Andreas W., Dapprich, Stefan, Vyboishchikov, Sergei F., Frenking, Gernot·1996·Organometallics

Abstract

Quantum mechanical ab initio calculations at the MP2 and CCSD(T) level of theory using effective core potentials (ECP) for the metals with a valence basis set of DZP quality and a 6-31G(d) all-electron basis set for the other elements are reported for the complexes M(CO) 5 L (M = Cr, Mo, W) and M(CO) 3 L (M = Ni, Pd, Pt) with ligands L = CO, SiO, CS, N 2, NO +, CN -, NC -, HCCH, CCH 2, CH 2, CF 2, and H 2 . The optimized geometries at MP2/II are in very good agreement with experiment. The theoretically predicted (CO) n M−L bond dissociation energies at CCSD(T)/II using MP2/II optimized geometries also agree quite well with experimental data. The (CO) n M−L bond is investigated using the charge decomposition analysis (CDA), which gives an interpretation of the donor−acceptor complexes in terms of charge donation, back-donation and repulsive polarization. The CDA results, which may be considered as a quantitative expression of the Dewar−Chatt−Duncanson model, are in agreement with the standard classification of the ligands.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/om950697a

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ehlers, A. W., Dapprich, S., Vyboishchikov, S. F., & Frenking, G.
Venue
Organometallics
Published
1996-01-09
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
105-117
ISSN
  • 0276-7333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6041
OpenAlex
W1992077520
Cited by
199
References
1
FWCI
12.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.