Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 572

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Design of Experiments (DoE) and Process Optimization. A Review of Recent Publications

Weissman, Steven A., Anderson, Neal G.·2015·Organic Process Research & Development

Abstract

Statistical design of experiments (DoE) is a powerful tool for optimizing processes, and it has been used in many stages of API development. This review summarizes selected publications from Organic Process Research & Development using DoE to show how processes can be optimized efficiently and how DoE findings may be applied to scale-up.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/op500169m

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 85

  1. Laird T., 2002, Org. Process Res. Dev., 6, 337, 10.1021/op0255581 · doi:10.1021/op0255581
  2. Mills J. E., 2003, Chemical Process Research, 87, 10.1021/bk-2004-0870.ch006 · doi:10.1021/bk-2004-0870.ch006
  3. Mullin R., 2013, Chem. Eng. News, 25, 10.1021/cen-09113-bus2 · doi:10.1021/cen-09113-bus2
  4. Ritter S. K., 2002, Chem. Eng. News, 80, 19, 10.1021/cen-v080n047.p019 · doi:10.1021/cen-v080n047.p019
  5. Anderson N. G., 2011, Org. Process Res. Dev., 15, 162, 10.1021/op1002825 · doi:10.1021/op1002825
  6. Looker A. R., 2010, Org. Process Res. Dev., 14, 1032, 10.1021/op900338g · doi:10.1021/op900338g
  7. Lendrem D., 2001, Org. Process Res. Dev., 5, 324, 10.1021/op000025i · doi:10.1021/op000025i
  8. Pilipauskas D. R., 1999, Process Chemistry in the Pharmaceutical Industry
  9. Kuethe J. T., 2009, Org. Process Res. Dev., 13, 471, 10.1021/op8002739 · doi:10.1021/op8002739
  10. Bacchi S., 2010, Org. Process Res. Dev., 14, 332, 10.1021/op900286r · doi:10.1021/op900286r
  11. Reid G. L., Am. Pharm. Rev.
  12. DelMonte A. J., 2011, Org. Process Res. Dev., 15, 64, 10.1021/op100225g · doi:10.1021/op100225g
  13. Mobele B. I., 2012, Org. Process Res. Dev., 16, 1385, 10.1021/op3000916 · doi:10.1021/op3000916
  14. Banks A., 2009, Org. Process Res. Dev., 13, 1130, 10.1021/op9001824 · doi:10.1021/op9001824
  15. Hajmowicz H., 2011, Org. Process Res. Dev., 15, 427, 10.1021/op100315k · doi:10.1021/op100315k
  16. Weiberth F. J., 2010, Org. Process Res. Dev., 14, 623, 10.1021/op100053k · doi:10.1021/op100053k
  17. Manoel E. A., 2012, Org. Process Res. Dev., 16, 1378, 10.1021/op300063f · doi:10.1021/op300063f
  18. Guercio G., 2009, Org. Process Res. Dev., 13, 1100, 10.1021/op9002032 · doi:10.1021/op9002032
  19. Cimarosti Z., 2010, Org. Process Res. Dev., 14, 805, 10.1021/op1000622 · doi:10.1021/op1000622
  20. Guercio G., 2010, Org. Process Res. Dev., 14, 840, 10.1021/op100097c · doi:10.1021/op100097c
  21. Argentine M. D., 2009, Org. Process Res. Dev., 13, 131, 10.1021/op8002486 · doi:10.1021/op8002486
  22. Goodman S. N., 2011, Org. Process Res. Dev., 15, 123, 10.1021/op100266s · doi:10.1021/op100266s
  23. Barton B., 2005, Org. Process Res. Dev., 9, 70, 10.1021/op049844j · doi:10.1021/op049844j
  24. Hida T., 2010, Org. Process Res. Dev., 14, 289, 10.1021/op900265h · doi:10.1021/op900265h
  25. Hida T., 2009, Tetrahedron, 65, 270, 10.1016/j.tet.2008.10.056 · doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.10.056
  26. Quittmann W., 2004, Org. Process Res. Dev., 8, 1036, 10.1021/op040014f · doi:10.1021/op040014f
  27. Rossi F., 2008, Org. Process Res. Dev., 12, 322, 10.1021/op7001112 · doi:10.1021/op7001112
  28. Radhamani K. N., 1993, J. Fluorine Chem., 95, 10.1016/S0022-1139(00)80065-2 · doi:10.1016/s0022-1139(00)80065-2
  29. Hanselmann R., 2009, Org. Process Res. Dev., 13, 54, 10.1021/op800238q · doi:10.1021/op800238q
  30. Moseley J. D., 2003, Org. Process Res. Dev., 7, 58, 10.1021/op020065h · doi:10.1021/op020065h
  31. Bayat Y., 2011, Org. Process Res. Dev., 15, 810, 10.1021/op200056j · doi:10.1021/op200056j
  32. Bayat Y., 2012, Org. Process Res. Dev., 16, 1733, 10.1021/op300162d · doi:10.1021/op300162d
  33. Guercio G., 2008, Org. Process Res. Dev., 12, 1188, 10.1021/op800146d · doi:10.1021/op800146d
  34. Anderson N. G., 2005, Org. Process Res. Dev., 9, 800, 10.1021/op050119y · doi:10.1021/op050119y
  35. Bravo F., 2010, Org. Process Res. Dev., 14, 832, 10.1021/op1000836 · doi:10.1021/op1000836
  36. Alorati A. D., 2012, Org. Process Res. Dev., 16, 1947, 10.1021/op300303p · doi:10.1021/op300303p
  37. Chaplin D., 2003, Org. Process Res. Dev., 7, 89, 10.1021/op025585r · doi:10.1021/op025585r
  38. Appell R. B., 2013, Org. Process Res. Dev., 17, 69, 10.1021/op3002855 · doi:10.1021/op3002855
  39. Dirat O., 2011, Org. Process Res. Dev., 15, 1010, 10.1021/op200107g · doi:10.1021/op200107g
  40. Guercio G., 2009, Org. Process Res. Dev., 13, 489, 10.1021/op8002823 · doi:10.1021/op8002823
  41. Alimardanov A. R., 2004, Org. Process Res. Dev., 8, 834, 10.1021/op040204q · doi:10.1021/op040204q
  42. Nadkarni D. V., 2008, Org. Process Res. Dev., 12, 1142, 10.1021/op800105j · doi:10.1021/op800105j
  43. Gooding O. W., 2010, Org. Process Res. Dev., 14, 119, 10.1021/op9002246 · doi:10.1021/op9002246
  44. Zhang P., 2005, Org. Process Res. Dev., 9, 583, 10.1021/op050051m · doi:10.1021/op050051m
  45. Massari L., 2010, Org. Process Res. Dev., 14, 1364, 10.1021/op100176u · doi:10.1021/op100176u
  46. Humphrey G. R., 2011, Org. Process Res. Dev., 15, 73, 10.1021/op100257r · doi:10.1021/op100257r
  47. Hopes P. A., 2006, Org. Process Res. Dev., 10, 808, 10.1021/op060057r · doi:10.1021/op060057r
  48. Brenek S. J., 2012, Org. Process Res. Dev., 16, 1348, 10.1021/op300131e · doi:10.1021/op300131e
  49. Barrios Sosa A. C., 2011, Org. Process Res. Dev., 15, 449, 10.1021/op100335q · doi:10.1021/op100335q
  50. Gopalsamy A., 2007, Org. Process Res. Dev., 11, 450, 10.1021/op700009t · doi:10.1021/op700009t
  51. Corona J. A., 2010, Org. Process Res. Dev., 14, 712, 10.1021/op100026u · doi:10.1021/op100026u
  52. Aggarwal V. K., 2006, Org. Process Res. Dev., 10, 64, 10.1021/op058013q · doi:10.1021/op058013q
  53. Cai C., 2007, Org. Process Res. Dev., 11, 328, 10.1021/op060215e · doi:10.1021/op060215e
  54. Nishimura K., 2012, Org. Process Res. Dev., 16, 225, 10.1021/op200312m · doi:10.1021/op200312m
  55. Van Arnum S. D., 2004, Org. Process Res. Dev., 8, 769, 10.1021/op049908q · doi:10.1021/op049908q
  56. Vedantham R., 2013, Org. Process Res. Dev., 17, 798, 10.1021/op3002596 · doi:10.1021/op3002596
  57. For a review of escitalopram syntheses, see:Harrington, P. J.Pharmaceutical Process Chemistry for Synthesis; Rethinking the Routes to Scale-Up;Wiley-VCH; 2011; pp30–91.
  58. Alam M., 2012, Org. Process Res. Dev., 16, 435, 10.1021/op200329x · doi:10.1021/op200329x
  59. Lawrence R. M., 2008, Org. Process Res. Dev., 12, 294, 10.1021/op7002776 · doi:10.1021/op7002776
  60. Raw S. A., 2011, Org. Process Res. Dev., 15, 688, 10.1021/op200079g · doi:10.1021/op200079g
  61. Bullock K. M., 2009, Org. Process Res. Dev., 13, 303, 10.1021/op800211c · doi:10.1021/op800211c
  62. Synoradzki L., 2005, Org. Process Res. Dev., 9, 18, 10.1021/op030029y · doi:10.1021/op030029y
  63. Kirschning A., 2013, Beilstein J. Org. Chem., 9, 1696, 10.3762/bjoc.9.193 · doi:10.3762/bjoc.9.193
  64. Anderson N. G., 2012, Org. Process Res. Dev., 16, 852, 10.1021/op200347k · doi:10.1021/op200347k
  65. Nieuwland P. J., 2011, Org. Process Res. Dev., 15, 783, 10.1021/op100338z · doi:10.1021/op100338z
  66. Koch K., 2009, Org. Process Res. Dev., 13, 1003, 10.1021/op900139u · doi:10.1021/op900139u
  67. Anderson B. G., 2012, Org. Process Res. Dev., 16, 967, 10.1021/op200346g · doi:10.1021/op200346g
  68. Tinder R., 2009, Org. Process Res. Dev., 13, 1401, 10.1021/op900078t · doi:10.1021/op900078t
  69. Vörös A., 2012, Org. Process Res. Dev., 16, 1717, 10.1021/op300113w · doi:10.1021/op300113w
  70. 10.1021/op400179f · doi:10.1021/op400179f
  71. Junior I. I., 2012, Org. Process Res. Dev., 16, 1098, 10.1021/op200132y · doi:10.1021/op200132y
  72. Sleveland D., 2012, Org. Process Res. Dev., 16, 1121, 10.1021/op3000493 · doi:10.1021/op3000493
  73. Sjövall S., 2004, Org. Process Res. Dev., 8, 802, 10.1021/op049904l · doi:10.1021/op049904l
  74. Cimarosti Z., 2010, Org. Process Res. Dev., 14, 1337, 10.1021/op100150b · doi:10.1021/op100150b
  75. Pu Y.-M., 2005, Org. Process Res. Dev., 9, 45, 10.1021/op049809c · doi:10.1021/op049809c
  76. Cimarosti Z., 2010, Org. Process Res. Dev., 14, 993, 10.1021/op900242x · doi:10.1021/op900242x
  77. Bravo F., 2010, Org. Process Res. Dev., 14, 1162, 10.1021/op100121s · doi:10.1021/op100121s
  78. Létinois U., 2013, Org. Process Res. Dev., 17, 427, 10.1021/op300190s · doi:10.1021/op300190s
  79. Andemichael Y., 2009, Org. Process Res. Dev., 13, 729, 10.1021/op900104g · doi:10.1021/op900104g
  80. de Koning P. D., 2011, Org. Process Res. Dev., 15, 1081, 10.1021/op200145j · doi:10.1021/op200145j
  81. Delhaye L., 2007, Org. Process Res. Dev., 11, 1104, 10.1021/op600275g · doi:10.1021/op600275g
  82. Chen J. J., 2003, Org. Process Res. Dev., 7, 313, 10.1021/op034018g · doi:10.1021/op034018g
  83. Grabarnick M., 2003, Org. Process Res. Dev., 7, 237, 10.1021/op020075i · doi:10.1021/op020075i
  84. Alozie D.-M., 2011, Org. Process Res. Dev., 15, 1412, 10.1021/op200093b · doi:10.1021/op200093b
  85. Musters J., 2013, Org. Process Res. Dev., 17, 87, 10.1021/op300292a · doi:10.1021/op300292a

Cited by

See all 572

Metadata

Authors
Weissman, S. A., & Anderson, N. G.
Venue
Organic Process Research & Development
Published
2014-08-29
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
1605-1633
ISSN
  • 1083-6160 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-586X
OpenAlex
W2045293316
Cited by
572
References
16
FWCI
12.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.