Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 245

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Development of a Chemoenzymatic Manufacturing Process for Pregabalin

Martinez, Carlos A., Hu, Shanghui, Dumond, Yves, Tao, Junhua, Kelleher, Patrick, Tully, Liam·2008·Organic Process Research & Development

Abstract

A new manufacturing process for ( S )-3-(aminomethyl)-5-methylhexanoic acid (Pregabalin), the active ingredient in Lyrica, has been developed. Using Lipolase, a commercially available lipase, rac -2-carboxyethyl-3-cyano-5-methylhexanoic acid ethyl ester ( 1 ) can be resolved to form 2-carboxyethyl-3-cyano-5-methylhexanoic acid ( 2 ). A heat-promoted decarboxylation of 2 efficiently generates ( S )-3-cyano-5-methylhexanoic acid ethyl ester ( 3 ), a known precursor of Pregabalin. This new route dramatically improved process efficiency compared to the first-generation process by setting the stereocenter early in the synthesis and enabling the facile racemization and reuse of ( R )- 1 . The chemoenzymatic process also reduced organic solvent usage resulting in a mostly aqueous process. Compared to the first-generation manufacturing process, the new process resulted in higher yields of pregabalin (40–45% after one recycle of ( R )- 1 ), and substantial reductions of waste streams corresponding to a 5-fold decrease in the E factor from 86 to 17.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/op7002248

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Martinez, C. A., Hu, S., Dumond, Y., Tao, J., Kelleher, P., & Tully, L.
Venue
Organic Process Research & Development
Published
2008-03-18
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
392-398
ISSN
  • 1083-6160 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-586X
OpenAlex
W1986394801
Cited by
245
References
0
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.