The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum Efficiency of Organic Solar Cells: Electro-Optical Cavity Considerations
Abstract
Organic solar cells (OSCs) are composed of one or more layers of order 100 nm thickness sandwiched between metallic and transparent electrodes. As such, they are low finesse, multilayer optical cavities where the optical field distribution is governed by the complex refractive indices and thicknesses of all layers in the “solar cell stack”. Optical interference and parasitic absorbance in nonactive layers can have a dramatic effect on the shape of the measured external quantum efficiency (EQE), the parameter often used to optimize device structure and derive critical insight regarding charge generation and extraction. In this communication, we study a model high efficiency OSC system (PCDTBT/PC70BM) as a function of active layer thickness, blend composition and processing. The spectral shapes of the measured EQEs show strong thickness and blend ratio dependence. However, when correctly determined, the internal quantum efficiencies (IQEs) are spectrally flat. The differences in EQE spectral shape predominantly originate from optical interference and parasitic absorptions rather than charge generation or transport phenomena. We also demonstrate similar results for a second model system (PCPDTBT/PC60BM) in which an energy-dependent “IQE-like” response has recently been used to justify the existence of hot excitons. Once again, we show the origin of these spectral phenomena to be optical, not electronic. These cases highlight the fact that thin film organic solar cells (even single junction) must be properly considered as low finesse electro-optical cavities, a point that is not universally appreciated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coffin, R. C., Peet, J., Rogers, J., & Bazan, G. C. (2009) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.403 · Cited by 597
Cited by
Electro-optics of perovskite solar cells
Lin, Q., Armin, A., Nagiri, R. C. R., Burn, P. L., & Meredith, P. (2015) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.284 · Cited by 1,749
Self-citationSolution-processed semiconductors for next-generation photodetectors
García de Arquer, F. P., Armin, A., Meredith, P., & Sargent, E. H. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.100 · Cited by 1,529
Self-citationOrganic Photodiodes: The Future of Full Color Detection and Image Sensing
Jansen‐van Vuuren, R. D., Armin, A., Pandey, A. K., Burn, P. L., & Meredith, P. (2016) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201505405 · Cited by 819
Self-citationNarrowband light detection via internal quantum efficiency manipulation of organic photodiodes
Armin, A., Jansen-van Vuuren, R. D., Kopidakis, N., Burn, P. L., & Meredith, P. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7343 · Cited by 592
Self-citationTriple-cation perovskite solar cells for visible light communications
Mica, N. A., Bian, R., Manousiadis, P., Jagadamma, L. K., Tavakkolnia, I., Haas, H., Turnbull, G. A., & Samuel, I. D. W. (2020) · Photonics Research · doi:10.1364/prj.393647 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Armin, A., Velusamy, M., Wolfer, P., Zhang, Y., Burn, P. L., Meredith, P., & Pivrikas, A.
- Venue
- ACS Photonics
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-02-21
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 173-181
- ISSN
- 2330-4022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985782357
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.