Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum Efficiency of Organic Solar Cells: Electro-Optical Cavity Considerations

Armin, Ardalan, Velusamy, Marappan, Wolfer, Pascal, Zhang, Yuliang, Burn, Paul L, Meredith, Paul, Pivrikas, Almantas·2014·ACS Photonics

Abstract

Organic solar cells (OSCs) are composed of one or more layers of order 100 nm thickness sandwiched between metallic and transparent electrodes. As such, they are low finesse, multilayer optical cavities where the optical field distribution is governed by the complex refractive indices and thicknesses of all layers in the “solar cell stack”. Optical interference and parasitic absorbance in nonactive layers can have a dramatic effect on the shape of the measured external quantum efficiency (EQE), the parameter often used to optimize device structure and derive critical insight regarding charge generation and extraction. In this communication, we study a model high efficiency OSC system (PCDTBT/PC70BM) as a function of active layer thickness, blend composition and processing. The spectral shapes of the measured EQEs show strong thickness and blend ratio dependence. However, when correctly determined, the internal quantum efficiencies (IQEs) are spectrally flat. The differences in EQE spectral shape predominantly originate from optical interference and parasitic absorptions rather than charge generation or transport phenomena. We also demonstrate similar results for a second model system (PCPDTBT/PC60BM) in which an energy-dependent “IQE-like” response has recently been used to justify the existence of hot excitons. Once again, we show the origin of these spectral phenomena to be optical, not electronic. These cases highlight the fact that thin film organic solar cells (even single junction) must be properly considered as low finesse electro-optical cavities, a point that is not universally appreciated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ph400044k

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Armin, A., Velusamy, M., Wolfer, P., Zhang, Y., Burn, P. L., Meredith, P., & Pivrikas, A.
Venue
ACS Photonics
Published
2014-02-21
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
173-181
ISSN
2330-4022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985782357
Cited by
160
References
1
FWCI
10.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.