The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Code Developments to Improve the Efficiency of Automated MS/MS Spectra Interpretation
Abstract
We report the results of our work to facilitate protein identification using tandem mass spectra and protein sequence databases. We describe a parallel version of SEQUEST (SEQUEST-PVM) that is tolerant toward arithmetic exceptions. The changes we report effectively separate search processes on slave nodes from each other. Therefore, if one of the slave nodes drops out of the cluster due to an error, the rest of the cluster will carry the search process to the end. SEQUEST has been widely used for protein identifications. The modifications made to the code improve its stability and effectiveness in a high-throughput production environment. We evaluate the overhead associated with the parallelization of SEQUEST. A prior version of software to preprocess LC/MS/MS data attempted to differentiate the charge states of ions. Singly charged ions can be accurately identified, but the software was unable to reliably differentiate tandem mass spectra of +2 and +3 charge states. We have designed and implemented a computational approach to narrow charge states of precursor ions from nominal resolution ion-trap tandem mass spectra. The preprocessing code, 2to3, determines the charge state of the precursor ion using its mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) and fragment ions contained in the tandem mass spectrum. For each possible charge state the program calculates the expected fragment ions that account for precursor ion m/z values. If any one of the numbers is less than an empirically determined threshold value then the spectrum corresponding to that charge state is removed. If both numbers are higher than the threshold value then +2 and +3 copies of the spectrum are kept. We present the comparison of results from protein identification experiments with and without using 2 to 3. It is shown that by determining the charge state and eliminating poor quality spectra 2to3 decreases the number of spectral files to be searched without affecting the search results. The decrease reduces computer requirements and researcher efforts for analysis of the results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Kolker, E., & Aebersold, R. (2002) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac025747h · Cited by 4,830
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
Self-citationCarrozza, M. J., Li, B., Florens, L., Suganuma, T., Swanson, S. K., Lee, K. K., Shia, W.-J., Anderson, S., Yates, J., Washburn, M. P., et al. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.023 · Cited by 1,294
Self-citationDieterich, D. C., Link, A. J., Graumann, J., Tirrell, D. A., & Schuman, E. M. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601637103 · Cited by 874
PepNovo: De Novo Peptide Sequencing via Probabilistic Network Modeling
Frank, A., & Pevzner, P. (2005) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac048788h · Cited by 688
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadygov, R. G., Eng, J., Durr, E., Saraf, A., McDonald, H., MacCoss, M. J., & Yates, J. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-03-06
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 211-215
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W2016605939
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Code Developments to Improve the Efficiency of Automated MS/MS Spectra Interpretation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/pr015514r
- The paper
- Sadygov, R. G., Eng, J., Durr, E., Saraf, A., McDonald, H., MacCoss, M. J., & Yates, J. R. (2002). Code Developments to Improve the Efficiency of Automated MS/MS Spectra Interpretation. Journal of Proteome Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr015514r
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.