The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enrichment of Integral Membrane Proteins for Proteomic Analysis Using Liquid Chromatography−Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Abstract
An increasing number of proteomic strategies rely on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to detect and identify constituent peptides of enzymatically digested proteins obtained from various organisms and cell types. However, sample preparation methods for isolating membrane proteins typically involve the use of detergents and chaotropes that often interfere with chromatographic separation and/or electrospray ionization. To address this problem, a sample preparation method combining carbonate extraction, surfactant-free organic solvent-assisted solubilization, and proteolysis was developed and demonstrated to target the membrane subproteome of Deinococcus radiodurans. Out of 503 proteins identified, 135 were recognized as hydrophobic on the basis of their calculated hydropathy values (GRAVY index), corresponding to coverage of 15% of the predicted hydrophobic proteome. Using the PSORT algorithm, 53 of the proteins identified were classified as integral outer membrane proteins and 215 were classified as integral cytoplasmic membrane proteins. All identified integral cytoplasmic membrane proteins had from 1 to 16 mapped transmembrane domains (TMDs), and 65% of those containing four or more mapped TMDs were identified by at least one hydrophobic membrane spanning peptide. The extensive coverage of the membrane subproteome (24%) by identification of highly hydrophobic proteins containing multiple TMDs validates the efficacy of the described sample preparation technique to isolate and solubilize hydrophobic integral membrane proteins from complex protein mixtures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid
Smith, P. K., Krohn, R. I., Hermanson, G. T., Mallia, A. K., Gartner, F. H., Provenzano, M. D., Fujimoto, E. K., Goeke, N. M., Olson, B. J., & Klenk, D. C. (1985) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(85)90442-7 · Cited by 18,482
Nakai, K., & Horton, P. (1999) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01336-x · Cited by 2,181
Cited by
Zubarev, R. A., & Makarov, A. (2013) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac4001223 · Cited by 658
Proteomics of Integral Membrane ProteinsTheory and Application
Speers, A. E., & Wu, C. C. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068286z · Cited by 325
Krokhin, O. V., Craig, R., Spicer, V., Ens, W., Standing, K. G., Beavis, R. C., & Wilkins, J. A. (2004) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m400031-mcp200 · Cited by 284
Proteomic and Bioinformatic Characterization of the Biogenesis and Function of Melanosomes
Chi, A., Valencia, J. C., Hu, Z.-Z., Watabe, H., Yamaguchi, H., Mangini, N. J., Huang, H., Canfield, V. A., Cheng, K. C., Yang, F., et al. (2006) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr060363j · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Blonder, J., Goshe, M. B., Moore, R. J., Pasa-Tolic, L., Masselon, C. D., Lipton, M. S., & Smith, R. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-05-18
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 351-360
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W2069093132
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enrichment of Integral Membrane Proteins for Proteomic Analysis Using Liquid Chromatography−Tandem Mass Spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/pr0255248
- The paper
- Blonder, J., Goshe, M. B., Moore, R. J., Pasa-Tolic, L., Masselon, C. D., Lipton, M. S., & Smith, R. D. (2002). Enrichment of Integral Membrane Proteins for Proteomic Analysis Using Liquid Chromatography−Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Journal of Proteome Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr0255248
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.