The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dissection of Proteolytic 18O Labeling: Endoprotease-Catalyzed 16O-to-18O Exchange of Truncated Peptide Substrates
Abstract
Proteolytic labeling in H2(18)O has been recently revived as a versatile method for proteomics research. To understand the molecular basis of the labeling process, we have dissected the process into two separate events: cleavage of the peptide amide bonds and exchange of the terminal carboxyl oxygens. It was demonstrated that both carboxyl oxygens can be catalytically labeled, independent of the cleavage step. Reaction kinetics of the tryptic 16O-to-18O exchange of YGGFMR, YGGFMK, and the tryptic digest of apomyoglobin were studied by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. A larger KM for the Lys-peptide (4400 +/- 700 microM), when compared to that of the Arg-peptide (KM 1300 +/- 300 microM), was mainly responsible for the slower reaction with YGGFMK (kcat/KM 0.64 +/- 0.14 microM(-1)min(-1)) compared to YGGFMR (kcat/KM 2.6 +/- 0.9 microM(-1)min(-1)). Multiplexed kinetic studies showed that endoprotease-catalyzed oxygen exchange is a general phenomenon, allowing homogeneous 18O2-coding of a variety of peptides. It was demonstrated for the first time that chymotrypsin 18O2-codes peptides during proteolysis. On the basis of the analyses reported here, we propose that proteolytic 18O labeling can be advantageously decoupled from protein digestion, and endoproteases can be used in a separate step to 18O2-code peptides for comparative studies after proteolysis has taken place.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags
Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Gerber, S. A., Turecek, F., Gelb, M. H., & Aebersold, R. (1999) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/13690 · Cited by 4,683
Cited by
Mass spectrometry–based proteomics turns quantitative
Ong, S.-E., & Mann, M. (2005) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio736 · Cited by 1,572
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
Adipokines: A treasure trove for the discovery of biomarkers for metabolic disorders
Lehr, S., Hartwig, S., & Sell, H. (2012) · PROTEOMICS – Clinical Applications · doi:10.1002/prca.201100052 · Cited by 352
Cilento, E. M., Jin, L., Stewart, T., Shi, M., Sheng, L., & Zhang, J. (2019) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.14635 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Yao, X., Afonso, C., & Fenselau, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-12-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-152
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W2091101858
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dissection of Proteolytic 18O Labeling: Endoprotease-Catalyzed 16O-to-18O Exchange of Truncated Peptide Substrates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/pr025572s
- The paper
- Yao, X., Afonso, C., & Fenselau, C. (2003). Dissection of Proteolytic 18O Labeling: Endoprotease-Catalyzed 16O-to-18O Exchange of Truncated Peptide Substrates. Journal of Proteome Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr025572s
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.