Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

N-linked Glycosylation Profiling of Pancreatic Cancer Serum Using Capillary Liquid Phase Separation Coupled with Mass Spectrometric Analysis

Zhao, Jia, Qiu, Weilian, Simeone, Diane M., Lubman, David M.·2007·Journal of Proteome Research

Abstract

Glycoproteins play important roles in various biological processes including intracellular transport, cell recognition, and cell-cell interactions. The change of the cellular glycosylation profile may have profound effects on cellular homeostasis and malignancy. Therefore, we have developed a sensitive screening approach for the comprehensive analysis of N-glycans and glycosylation sites on human serum proteins. Using this approach, N-linked glycopeptides were extracted by double lectin affinity chromatography. The glycans were enzymatically cleaved from the peptides and then profiled using capillary hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled online with ESI-TOF MS. The structures of the separated glycans were determined by MALDI quadrupole ion-trap TOF mass spectrometry in both positive and negative modes. The glycosylation sites were elucidated by sequencing of PNGase F modified glycopeptides using nanoRP-LC-ESI-MS/MS. Alterations of glycosylation were analyzed by comparing oligosaccharide expression of serum glycoproteins at different disease stages. The efficiency of this method was demonstrated by the analysis of pancreatic cancer serum compared to normal serum. Ninety-two individual glycosylation sites and 202 glycan peaks with 105 unique carbohydrate structures were identified from approximately 25 mug glycopeptides. Forty-four oligosaccharides were found to be distinct in the pancreatic cancer serum. Increased branching of N-linked oligosaccharides and increased fucosylation and sialylation were observed in samples from patients with pancreatic cancer. The methodology described in this study may elucidate novel, cancer-specific oligosaccharides and glycosylation sites, some of which may have utility as useful biomarkers of cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/pr0604458

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, J., Qiu, W., Simeone, D. M., & Lubman, D. M.
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2007-01-24
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
1126-1138
ISSN
  • 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3907
OpenAlex
W2048083030
Cited by
160
References
1
FWCI
6.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.