The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proteomic Parsimony through Bipartite Graph Analysis Improves Accuracy and Transparency
Open accessAbstract
Assembling peptides identified from LC-MS/MS spectra into a list of proteins is a critical step in analyzing shotgun proteomics data. As one peptide sequence can be mapped to multiple proteins in a database, naïve protein assembly can substantially overstate the number of proteins found in samples. We model the peptide-protein relationships in a bipartite graph and use efficient graph algorithms to identify protein clusters with shared peptides and to derive the minimal list of proteins. We test the effects of this parsimony analysis approach using MS/MS data sets generated from a defined human protein mixture, a yeast whole cell extract, and a human serum proteome after MARS column depletion. The results demonstrate that the bipartite parsimony technique not only simplifies protein lists but also improves the accuracy of protein identification. We use bipartite graphs for the visualization of the protein assembly results to render the parsimony analysis process transparent to users. Our approach also groups functionally related proteins together and improves the comprehensibility of the results. We have implemented the tool in the IDPicker package. The source code and binaries for this protein assembly pipeline are available under Mozilla Public License at the following URL: http://www.mc.vanderbilt.edu/msrc/bioinformatics/.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elias, J. E., & Gygi, S. P. (2007) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth1019 · Cited by 3,925
Interpretation of Shotgun Proteomic Data
Nesvizhskii, A. I., & Aebersold, R. (2005) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r500012-mcp200 · Cited by 1,025
Cited by
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
Tabb, D. L., Vega-Montoto, L., Rudnick, P. A., Variyath, A. M., Ham, A.-J. L., Bunk, D. M., Kilpatrick, L. E., Billheimer, D. D., Blackman, R. K., Cardasis, H. L., et al. (2010) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr9006365 · Cited by 551
Self-citationDepletion of Abundant Plasma Proteins and Limitations of Plasma Proteomics
Tu, C., Rudnick, P. A., Martinez, M. Y., Cheek, K. L., Stein, S. E., Slebos, R. J. C., & Liebler, D. C. (2010) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr100646w · Cited by 390
Proteogenomic Characterization of Human Early-Onset Gastric Cancer
Mun, D.-G., Bhin, J., Kim, S., Kim, H., Jung, J. H., Jung, Y., Jang, Y. E., Park, J. M., Kim, H., Jung, Y., et al. (2019) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2018.12.003 · Cited by 294
De novo design of protein homo-oligomers with modular hydrogen-bond network–mediated specificity
Boyken, S. E., Chen, Z., Groves, B., Langan, R. A., Oberdorfer, G., Ford, A., Gilmore, J. M., Xu, C., DiMaio, F., Pereira, J. H., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad8865 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, B., Chambers, M. C., & Tabb, D. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-08-04
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3549-3557
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W1990273811
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proteomic Parsimony through Bipartite Graph Analysis Improves Accuracy and Transparency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/pr070230d
- The paper
- Zhang, B., Chambers, M. C., & Tabb, D. L. (2007). Proteomic Parsimony through Bipartite Graph Analysis Improves Accuracy and Transparency. Journal of Proteome Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr070230d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.