The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Snake Venomics of African Spitting Cobras: Toxin Composition and Assessment of Congeneric Cross-Reactivity of the Pan-African EchiTAb-Plus-ICP Antivenom by Antivenomics and Neutralization Approaches
Open accessAbstract
Venomic analysis of the venoms of Naja nigricollis, N. katiensis, N. nubiae, N. mossambica, and N. pallida revealed similar compositional trends. The high content of cytotoxins and PLA(2)s may account for the extensive tissue necrosis characteristic of the envenomings by these species. The high abundance of a type I α-neurotoxin in N. nubiae may be responsible for the high lethal toxicity of this venom (in rodents). The ability of EchiTAb-Plus-ICP antivenom to immunodeplete and neutralize the venoms of African spitting cobras was assessed by antivenomics and neutralization tests. It partially immunodepleted 3FTx and PLA(2)s and completely immunodepleted SVMPs and CRISPs in all venoms. The antivenom neutralized the dermonecrotic and PLA(2) activities of all African Naja venoms, whereas lethality was eliminated in the venoms of N. nigricollis, N. mossambica, and N. pallida but not in those of N. nubiae and N. katiensis. The lack of neutralization of lethality of N. nubiae venom may be of medical relevance only in relatively populous areas of the Saharan region. The impaired activity of EchiTAb-Plus-ICP against N. katiensis may not represent a major concern. This species is sympatric with N. nigricollis in many regions of Africa, although very few bites have been attributed to it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fox, J. W., & Serrano, S. M. T. (2005) · Toxicon · doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2005.02.012 · Cited by 587
Cited by
A Review and Database of Snake Venom Proteomes
Tasoulis, T., & Isbister, G. (2017) · Toxins · doi:10.3390/toxins9090290 · Cited by 616
Synergistic strategies of predominant toxins in snake venoms
Xiong, S., & Huang, C. (2018) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.02.004 · Cited by 78
Kalita, B., Utkin, Y. N., & Mukherjee, A. K. (2022) · Toxins · doi:10.3390/toxins14120839 · Cited by 50
Rodent Lethality Models Are Problematic for Evaluating Antivenoms for Human Envenoming
Silva, A., Hodgson, W. C., Tasoulis, T., & Isbister, G. K. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.830384 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Petras, D., Sanz, L., Segura, Á., Herrera, M., Villalta, M., Solano, D., Vargas, M., León, G., Warrell, D. A., Theakston, R. D. G., Harrison, R. A., Durfa, N., Nasidi, A., Gutiérrez, J. M., & Calvete, J. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-01-31
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1266-1280
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W2417578947
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Snake Venomics of African Spitting Cobras: Toxin Composition and Assessment of Congeneric Cross-Reactivity of the Pan-African EchiTAb-Plus-ICP Antivenom by Antivenomics and Neutralization Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/pr101040f
- The paper
- Petras, D., Sanz, L., Segura, Á., Herrera, M., Villalta, M., Solano, D., Vargas, M., León, G., Warrell, D. A., Theakston, R. D. G., Harrison, R. A., Durfa, N., Nasidi, A., Gutiérrez, J. M., & Calvete, J. J. (2011). Snake Venomics of African Spitting Cobras: Toxin Composition and Assessment of Congeneric Cross-Reactivity of the Pan-African EchiTAb-Plus-ICP Antivenom by Antivenomics and Neutralization Approaches. Journal of Proteome Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr101040f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.