The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Vivo Evaluation of the Pulmonary Toxicity of Cellulose Nanocrystals: A Renewable and Sustainable Nanomaterial of the Future
Open accessAbstract
The use of cellulose as building blocks for the development of novel functional materials is rapidly growing. Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), with advantageous chemical and mechanical properties, have gained prominence in a number of applications, such as in nanofillers in polymer composites, building materials, cosmetics, food, and the drug industry. Therefore, it becomes critical to evaluate the potential health effects associated with CNC exposures. The objective of this study was to compare pulmonary outcomes caused by exposure of C57BL/6 mice to two different processed forms of CNC derived from wood, i.e., CNCS (10 wt %; gel/suspension) and CNCP (powder), and compare to asbestos induced responses. Pharyngeal aspiration with CNCS and CNCP was found to facilitate innate inflammatory response assessed by an increase in leukocytes and eosinophils recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Biomarkers of tissue damage were elevated to a higher extent in mice exposed to CNCP. Compared to CNCP, CNCS caused a significant increase in the accumulation of oxidatively modified proteins. The up-regulation of inflammatory cytokines was higher in the lungs after CNCS treatments. Most importantly, CNCP materials were significantly longer than CNCS. Taken together, our data suggests that particle morphology and nanosize dimensions of CNCs, regardless of the same source, may be critical factors affecting the type of innate immune inflammatory responses. Because various processes have been developed for producing highly sophisticated nanocellulose materials, detailed assessment of specific health outcomes with respect to their physical-structural-chemical properties is highly warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beck-Candanedo, S., Roman, M., & Gray, D. G. (2005) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm049300p · Cited by 1,588
Rodlike cellulose microcrystals: Structure, properties and applications
de Souza Lima, M. M., & Borsali, R. (2004) · Macromolecular Rapid Communications · doi:10.1002/marc.200300268 · Cited by 894
Nanocomposites of cellulose acetate butyrate reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals
Grunert, M., & Winter, W. T. (2002) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1023/a:1021065905986 · Cited by 465
Cited by
Kaushik, M., & Moores, A. (2016) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c5gc02500a · Cited by 606
Advances in cellulose nanomaterials
Kargarzadeh, H., Mariano, M., Gopakumar, D., Ahmad, I., Thomas, S., Dufresne, A., Huang, J., & Lin, N. (2018) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-018-1723-5 · Cited by 508
Recent advances on cellulose nanocrystals for Pickering emulsions: Development and challenge
Dai, H., Wu, J., Zhang, H., Chen, Y., Ma, L., Huang, H., Huang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2020.05.016 · Cited by 313
Nanocellulose: Recent advances and its prospects in environmental remediation
Shak, K. P. Y., Pang, Y. L., & Mah, S. K. (2018) · Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology · doi:10.3762/bjnano.9.232 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Yanamala, N., Farcas, M. T., Hatfield, M. K., Kisin, E. R., Kagan, V. E., Geraci, C. L., & Shvedova, A. A.
- Venue
- ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-05-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1691-1698
- ISSN
- 2168-0485 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2314823245
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vivo Evaluation of the Pulmonary Toxicity of Cellulose Nanocrystals: A Renewable and Sustainable Nanomaterial of the Future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/sc500153k
- The paper
- Yanamala, N., Farcas, M. T., Hatfield, M. K., Kisin, E. R., Kagan, V. E., Geraci, C. L., & Shvedova, A. A. (2014). In Vivo Evaluation of the Pulmonary Toxicity of Cellulose Nanocrystals: A Renewable and Sustainable Nanomaterial of the Future. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1021/sc500153k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.