Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Determination of 8-Oxoguanine in DNA by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry and HPLC-Electrochemical Detection: Overestimation of the Background Level of the Oxidized Base by the Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Assay

Ravanat, Jean-Luc, Turesky, Robert J., Gremaud, Eric, Trudel, Laura J., Stadler, Richard H.·1995·Chemical Research in Toxicology

Abstract

Two analytical methods, one involving the combined use of reverse-phase HPLC and electrochemical detection (HPLC-EC) and one involving a mass spectrometric detection after gas chromatography separation (GC/MS), were developed for the detection of 8-oxoguanine in DNA. In order to obtain quantitative results, 2,6-diamino-8-oxopurine, whose chemical structure and electrochemical response are very similar to 8-oxoguanine, has been employed as an internal standard in the HPLC-EC assay. In the case of the GC/MS method, an isotopically stable (M + 4) 8-oxoguanine has been employed as an internal standard. Both methods are able to detect approximately 1 modification per 10(6) DNA bases. The background level of 8-oxoguanine in DNA as determined by GC/MS is approximately 50-fold higher than that determined by the HPLC-EC assay. The discrepancy between the two methods is due to an artifactual oxidation of guanine during the derivatization reaction as demonstrated by using pure guanine. The amount of 8-oxoguanine in guanine, determined by GC/MS, increases linearly with the time of derivatization, indicating that an oxidation occurs during the silylation reaction. Derivatization under nitrogen atmosphere reduces but does not suppress the artifactual oxidation. The amount of 8-oxoguanine in DNA, quantified by GC/MS, is comparable to that obtained by HPLC-EC when 8-oxoguanine is prepurified by HPLC or by immunoaffinity chromatography, prior to the silylation reaction. The artifactual formation of 8-oxoguanine during the derivatization reaction may explain, at least in part, why the values reported for 8-oxoguanine determination by GC/MS are generally about 1 order of magnitude higher than that determined by HPLC-EC. Prepurification of 8-oxoguanine from guanine is recommended in order to obtain reliable results by GC/MS which may be compared to HPLC-EC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/tx00050a007

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Ravanat, J.-L., Turesky, R. J., Gremaud, E., Trudel, L. J., & Stadler, R. H.
Venue
Chemical Research in Toxicology
Published
1995-12
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
1039-1045
ISSN
  • 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5010
OpenAlex
W2053258455
Cited by
207
References
0
FWCI
12.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of 8-Oxoguanine in DNA by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry and HPLC-Electrochemical Detection: Overestimation of the Background Level of the Oxidized Base by the Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Assay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/tx00050a007
The paper
Ravanat, J.-L., Turesky, R. J., Gremaud, E., Trudel, L. J., & Stadler, R. H. (1995). Determination of 8-Oxoguanine in DNA by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry and HPLC-Electrochemical Detection: Overestimation of the Background Level of the Oxidized Base by the Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Assay. Chemical Research in Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx00050a007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.