The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determination of 8-Oxoguanine in DNA by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry and HPLC-Electrochemical Detection: Overestimation of the Background Level of the Oxidized Base by the Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Assay
Abstract
Two analytical methods, one involving the combined use of reverse-phase HPLC and electrochemical detection (HPLC-EC) and one involving a mass spectrometric detection after gas chromatography separation (GC/MS), were developed for the detection of 8-oxoguanine in DNA. In order to obtain quantitative results, 2,6-diamino-8-oxopurine, whose chemical structure and electrochemical response are very similar to 8-oxoguanine, has been employed as an internal standard in the HPLC-EC assay. In the case of the GC/MS method, an isotopically stable (M + 4) 8-oxoguanine has been employed as an internal standard. Both methods are able to detect approximately 1 modification per 10(6) DNA bases. The background level of 8-oxoguanine in DNA as determined by GC/MS is approximately 50-fold higher than that determined by the HPLC-EC assay. The discrepancy between the two methods is due to an artifactual oxidation of guanine during the derivatization reaction as demonstrated by using pure guanine. The amount of 8-oxoguanine in guanine, determined by GC/MS, increases linearly with the time of derivatization, indicating that an oxidation occurs during the silylation reaction. Derivatization under nitrogen atmosphere reduces but does not suppress the artifactual oxidation. The amount of 8-oxoguanine in DNA, quantified by GC/MS, is comparable to that obtained by HPLC-EC when 8-oxoguanine is prepurified by HPLC or by immunoaffinity chromatography, prior to the silylation reaction. The artifactual formation of 8-oxoguanine during the derivatization reaction may explain, at least in part, why the values reported for 8-oxoguanine determination by GC/MS are generally about 1 order of magnitude higher than that determined by HPLC-EC. Prepurification of 8-oxoguanine from guanine is recommended in order to obtain reliable results by GC/MS which may be compared to HPLC-EC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Direct and indirect effects of UV radiation on DNA and its components
Ravanat, J.-L., Douki, T., & Cadet, J. (2001) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology · doi:10.1016/s1011-1344(01)00206-8 · Cited by 980
Self-citationFree radical-induced damage to DNA: mechanisms and measurement
Dizdaroglu, M., Jaruga, P., Birincioglu, M., & Rodriguez, H. (2002) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0891-5849(02)00826-2 · Cited by 953
Cadet, J., Douki, T., & Ravanat, J.-L. (2008) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar700245e · Cited by 555
Self-citationLyras, L., Cairns, N. J., Jenner, A., Jenner, P., & Halliwell, B. (1997) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.68052061.x · Cited by 531
Pouget, J.-P., Douki, T., Richard, M.-J., & Cadet, J. (2000) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx000020e · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Ravanat, J.-L., Turesky, R. J., Gremaud, E., Trudel, L. J., & Stadler, R. H.
- Venue
- Chemical Research in Toxicology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1039-1045
- ISSN
- 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5010
- OpenAlex
- W2053258455
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of 8-Oxoguanine in DNA by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry and HPLC-Electrochemical Detection: Overestimation of the Background Level of the Oxidized Base by the Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Assay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/tx00050a007
- The paper
- Ravanat, J.-L., Turesky, R. J., Gremaud, E., Trudel, L. J., & Stadler, R. H. (1995). Determination of 8-Oxoguanine in DNA by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry and HPLC-Electrochemical Detection: Overestimation of the Background Level of the Oxidized Base by the Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Assay. Chemical Research in Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx00050a007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.