The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can In Vitro Metabolism-Dependent Covalent Binding Data in Liver Microsomes Distinguish Hepatotoxic from Nonhepatotoxic Drugs? An Analysis of 18 Drugs with Consideration of Intrinsic Clearance and Daily Dose
Abstract
In vitro covalent binding assessments of drugs have been useful in providing retrospective insights into the association between drug metabolism and a resulting toxicological response. On the basis of these studies, it has been advocated that in vitro covalent binding to liver microsomal proteins in the presence and the absence of NADPH be used routinely to screen drug candidates. However, the utility of this approach in predicting toxicities of drug candidates accurately remains an unanswered question. Importantly, the years of research that have been invested in understanding metabolic bioactivation and covalent binding and its potential role in toxicity have focused only on those compounds that demonstrate toxicity. Investigations have not frequently queried whether in vitro covalent binding could be observed with drugs with good safety records. Eighteen drugs (nine hepatotoxins and nine nonhepatotoxins in humans) were assessed for in vitro covalent binding in NADPH-supplemented human liver microsomes. Of the two sets of nine drugs, seven in each set were shown to undergo some degree of covalent binding. Among hepatotoxic drugs, acetaminophen, carbamazepine, diclofenac, indomethacin, nefazodone, sudoxicam, and tienilic acid demonstrated covalent binding, while benoxaprofen and felbamate did not. Of the nonhepatotoxic drugs evaluated, buspirone, diphenhydramine, meloxicam, paroxetine, propranolol, raloxifene, and simvastatin demonstrated covalent binding, while ibuprofen and theophylline did not. A quantitative comparison of covalent binding in vitro intrinsic clearance did not separate the two groups of compounds, and in fact, paroxetine, a nonhepatotoxin, showed the greatest amount of covalent binding in microsomes. Including factors such as the fraction of total metabolism comprised by covalent binding and the total daily dose of each drug improved the discrimination between hepatotoxic and nontoxic drugs based on in vitro covalent binding data; however, the approach still would falsely identify some agents as potentially hepatotoxic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The safety of statins in clinical practice
Armitage, J. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60716-8 · Cited by 833
Diclofenac-induced liver injury: a paradigm of idiosyncratic drug toxicity
Boelsterli, U. (2003) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0041-008x(03)00368-5 · Cited by 403
CASE REPORT: Troglitazone-Induced Fulminant Hepatic Failure
Murphy, E. J., Davern, T. J., Shakil, A. O., Shick, L., Masharani, U., Chow, H., Freise, C., Lee, W. M., & Bass, N. M. (2000) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1023/a:1005405526283 · Cited by 111
Cited by
Stepan, A. F., Walker, D. P., Bauman, J., Price, D. A., Baillie, T. A., Kalgutkar, A. S., & Aleo, M. D. (2011) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx200168d · Cited by 698
Self-citationManaging the challenge of chemically reactive metabolites in drug development
Park, B. K., Boobis, A., Clarke, S., Goldring, C. E. P., Jones, D., Kenna, J. G., Lambert, C., Laverty, H. G., Naisbitt, D. J., Nelson, S., et al. (2011) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3408 · Cited by 462
Self-citationFDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury
Chen, M., Vijay, V., Shi, Q., Liu, Z., Fang, H., & Tong, W. (2011) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2011.05.007 · Cited by 406
Organotypic liver culture models: meeting current challenges in toxicity testing
LeCluyse, E. L., Witek, R. P., Andersen, M. E., & Powers, M. J. (2012) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.3109/10408444.2012.682115 · Cited by 363
Aleo, M. D., Luo, Y., Swiss, R., Bonin, P. D., Potter, D. M., & Will, Y. (2014) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.27206 · Cited by 215
Metadata
- Authors
- Obach, R. S., Kalgutkar, A. S., Soglia, J. R., & Zhao, S. X.
- Venue
- Chemical Research in Toxicology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-08-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1814-1822
- ISSN
- 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5010
- OpenAlex
- W1987144475
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.