The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fractionation of Aqueous Cigarette Tar Extracts: Fractions That Contain the Tar Radical Cause DNA Damage
Abstract
Previously, we have shown that aqueous cigarette tar (ACT) extracts contain a long-lived tar radical that associates with DNA in isolated rat alveolar macrophages and causes DNA damage in isolated rat thymocytes. These ACT solutions reduce oxygen to produce superoxide and, ultimately, hydrogen peroxide. In this study, we report the fractionation of ACT solutions prepared from the tar from five cigarettes using Sephadex columns. The fractions were analyzed by UV and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). The fractions containing polyphenolic species (principally catechol and hydroquinone, as determined by MS) caused most of the observed DNA damage in rat thymocytes. These DNA-damaging fractions produced superoxide, H2O2, and hydroxyl radicals. Stable free radicals were identified as o- and p-benzosemiquinone radicals by EPR spectroscopy. Hydroxyl radicals were detected by EPR spin-trapping with 5, 5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO). Catalase inhibited the EPR signal of the DMPO-OH adduct, indicating that H2O2 is the precursor of the hydroxyl radical spin adduct. The Sephadex separation resulted in a 90-fold concentration of the hydrogen peroxide-generating capacity of the fractions that contained polyphenols, relative to the unfractionated ACT solution. Another fraction, which contained nicotine, caused some DNA damage, but this damage was 28-fold less than the damage caused by the most damaging phenolic fraction. These results support our hypothesis that the tar radical system is an equilibrium mixture of semiquinones, hydroquinones, and quinones. The tar radical associates with DNA, causes DNA damage, and very likely is involved in the toxicity associated with cigarette smoking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The pathophysiology of cigarette smoking and cardiovascular disease
Ambrose, J. A., & Barua, R. S. (2004) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.047 · Cited by 2,394
Tobacco Smoke Carcinogens and Lung Cancer
Hecht, S. S. (1999) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/91.14.1194 · Cited by 1,976
Schweigert, N., Zehnder, A. J. B., & Eggen, R. I. L. (2001) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1462-2920.2001.00176.x · Cited by 586
Role of Free Radicals in the Toxicity of Airborne Fine Particulate Matter
Dellinger, B., Pryor, W. A., Cueto, R., Squadrito, G. L., Hegde, V., & Deutsch, W. A. (2001) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx010050x · Cited by 532
Self-citationValavanidis, A., Vlachogianni, T., & Fiotakis, K. (2009) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph6020445 · Cited by 519
“Biochemical mechanisms of carcinogenic action by tobacco smoke constituents and oxidative damage in cellular DNA by ROS have been observed with very sensitive techniques [18-20].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Pryor, W. A., Stone, K., Zang, L.-Y., & Bermúdez, E.
- Venue
- Chemical Research in Toxicology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-04-21
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 441-448
- ISSN
- 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5010
- OpenAlex
- W2054909375
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fractionation of Aqueous Cigarette Tar Extracts: Fractions That Contain the Tar Radical Cause DNA Damage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/tx970159y
- The paper
- Pryor, W. A., Stone, K., Zang, L.-Y., & Bermúdez, E. (1998). Fractionation of Aqueous Cigarette Tar Extracts: Fractions That Contain the Tar Radical Cause DNA Damage. Chemical Research in Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx970159y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.