Cited by 218Bioenergy crop production and managementCrop Yield and Soil FertilityAgricultural Science and Fertilization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Cultivation of Miscanthus under West European conditions: Seasonal changes in dry matter production, nutrient uptake and remobilization

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1004244614537

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • M×g aids the cycling of many essential nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Na, Mg, Fe, and Si).

    “Additionally, they aid the cycling of many other essential nutrients, e.g., N, P, K, Ca, Na, Mg, Fe, and Si (e.g., El Bassam, 1997; Himken et al., 1997; Majtkowski, 1998; Ercoli et al., 1999; Kahle et al., 2001; Kozak et al., 2006; Danalatos et al., 2007; Kalembasa and Malinowska, 2007; Borzącka-Walker, 2008; Christian et al., 2008; Curley et al., 2009).”
  • Carbon inputs from Miscanthus rhizomes (1.01 to 2.66 Mg C ha−1 year−1) were generally greater than those from roots (0.19-0.86 Mg C ha−1 year−1).

    “The C inputs from Miscanthus rhizomes (1.01 to 2.66 Mg C ha−1 year−1) were generally greater [57, 61, 66, 80, 85] than those from roots (0.19–0.86 Mg C ha−1 year−1, Table 1).”

Citations

The citation lists are queued

They are fetched later and appear here then.

References 11 · Cited by 218

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Bolhár-Nordenkampf H R 1992 Ökophysiologische Verflechtungen in einer forcierten Biomasseproduktion. InKongreßbericht Miscanthus sinensis giganteus. Eds. W Geissler and R Puxkandl-Ull. pp 34-46. Verlag Erneuerbare Energien, Gleisdorf.
  2. Escher G and Rupp M 1993 Nachwachsende Rohstoffe f(ü)r Energieerzeugung und Chemie. BWK 45, 406-410.
  3. Greef J M 1996 Etablierung und Biomassebildung von Miscanthus (χ) giganteus. Cuvillier Verlag, G(ö)ttingen. 162 p.
  4. giganteus. Angew. Bot. 67, 87-90.
  5. Hartmann H and Strehler A 1995 Die Stellung der Biomasse im Vergleich zu anderen erneuerbaren Energietr(ä)gern aus (ö)kologischer, (ö)konomischer und technischer Sicht. Schriftenr. Nachwachs. Rohstoffe 3, 1-396.
  6. Holz F 1974 Die automatische Bestimmung des Stickstoffs als Indolphenolgr(ü)n in B(ö)den und Pflanzen. Landwirtsch. Forsch. 26, 177-191.
  7. Hotz A, Kolb W and Schwarz T 1989 Nachwachsende Rohstoffe-Eine Chance f(ü)r die Landwirtschaft? Bayer. Landwirt. Jahrb. 66, 15-26.
  8. Koike J, Sh(ô)ji S and Yoshida S 1975 Aboveground biomass and litter in the Miscanthus sinensiscommunity. JIBP Synth.13, 141-147.
  9. Kolb W, Hotz A and Kuhn W 1990 Untersuchungen zur Leistungsf (ä)higkeit ausdauernder Gr(ä)ser f(ü)r die Energie-und Rohstoffgewinnung. Rasen-Turf-Gazon 4, 75-79.
  10. Midorikawa B 1978 Method to determine primary production. InHandbook of Grassland Investigation. Ed. M Numata. pp 61- 77. Univ. of Tokyo Press, Tokyo.
  11. Midorikawa B and Masuzawa T 1978 Studies on production processes and net production of the community. JIBP Synth. 19, 222-230.
  12. Midorikawa B, Shimada Y, Iwaki H and Ohga N 1975 Root production in seminatural grassland community dominated by Miscanthus sinensisin Kawatabi area. JIBP Synth.13, 114-123.
  13. Nygaard Nielsen P 1988 Produktiviteten of elefantengras Miscanthus sinensis 'Giganteus' pa farskellige jordtyper. Saertryk Tidsskrift Planteavl 91, 275-281.
  14. Schweiger P and Stolzenburg K 1993 Energie vom Acker-Anbauversuche mit Miscanthusin der Rheinebene 1989-1993. Informationen f(ü)r die Pflanzenproduktion Heft 1. Ed. Landesanstalt f(ü)r Pflanzenbau, Forchheim.
  15. Shimada Y, Iwaki H and Midorikawa B 1975 Primary productivity of the Miscanthus sinensiscommunity at the Kawatabi IBP area-standing crop of aboveground parts. JIBP Synth. 13, 110-114.
  16. Thiemann R 1995 Produktionstechnik von Miscanthus. InSymposium Miscanthus. Biomassebereitstellung, energetische und stoffliche Nutzung. Schriftenr. Nachwachs. Rohstoffe 4, 103- 112.
  17. Thoma H 1991 Pflanzenbauliche, erntetechnische, verbrennungstechnische, (ö)kologische und (ö)konomische Aspekte der energetischen Nutzung von Einjahrespflanzen durch direkte Verbrennung. Bayer. Landwirtsch. Jahrb. 68, 916-988.

Metadata

Authors
Himken, M., Lammel, J., Neukirchen, D., Czypionka-Krause, U., & Olfs, H.-W.
Affiliations
Norsk Hydro (Germany) (DE)
Venue
Plant and Soil
Published
1997-02
Volume
189
Issue
1
Pages
117-126
ISSN
  • 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5036
OpenAlex
W1277224153
Cited by
218
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 20
FWCI
6.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Plant and Soil (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
Miscanthus, nutrient remobilization, nutrient uptake, dry matter production, nitrogen fertilization, rhizome, senescence, nutrient balance, energy crops, renewable energy crops, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review