The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Cultivation of Miscanthus under West European conditions: Seasonal changes in dry matter production, nutrient uptake and remobilization
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
M×g aids the cycling of many essential nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Na, Mg, Fe, and Si).
“Additionally, they aid the cycling of many other essential nutrients, e.g., N, P, K, Ca, Na, Mg, Fe, and Si (e.g., El Bassam, 1997; Himken et al., 1997; Majtkowski, 1998; Ercoli et al., 1999; Kahle et al., 2001; Kozak et al., 2006; Danalatos et al., 2007; Kalembasa and Malinowska, 2007; Borzącka-Walker, 2008; Christian et al., 2008; Curley et al., 2009).”
From Establishment, Growth, and Yield Potential of the Perennial Grass Miscanthus × Giganteus on Degraded Coal Mine Soils (2017) · cites this paper as Himken et al., 1997
Carbon inputs from Miscanthus rhizomes (1.01 to 2.66 Mg C ha−1 year−1) were generally greater than those from roots (0.19-0.86 Mg C ha−1 year−1).
“The C inputs from Miscanthus rhizomes (1.01 to 2.66 Mg C ha−1 year−1) were generally greater [57, 61, 66, 80, 85] than those from roots (0.19–0.86 Mg C ha−1 year−1, Table 1).”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [85]
Citations
The citation lists are queued
They are fetched later and appear here then.
References 11 · Cited by 218
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Bolhár-Nordenkampf H R 1992 Ökophysiologische Verflechtungen in einer forcierten Biomasseproduktion. InKongreßbericht Miscanthus sinensis giganteus. Eds. W Geissler and R Puxkandl-Ull. pp 34-46. Verlag Erneuerbare Energien, Gleisdorf.
- Escher G and Rupp M 1993 Nachwachsende Rohstoffe f(ü)r Energieerzeugung und Chemie. BWK 45, 406-410.
- Greef J M 1996 Etablierung und Biomassebildung von Miscanthus (χ) giganteus. Cuvillier Verlag, G(ö)ttingen. 162 p.
- giganteus. Angew. Bot. 67, 87-90.
- Hartmann H and Strehler A 1995 Die Stellung der Biomasse im Vergleich zu anderen erneuerbaren Energietr(ä)gern aus (ö)kologischer, (ö)konomischer und technischer Sicht. Schriftenr. Nachwachs. Rohstoffe 3, 1-396.
- Holz F 1974 Die automatische Bestimmung des Stickstoffs als Indolphenolgr(ü)n in B(ö)den und Pflanzen. Landwirtsch. Forsch. 26, 177-191.
- Hotz A, Kolb W and Schwarz T 1989 Nachwachsende Rohstoffe-Eine Chance f(ü)r die Landwirtschaft? Bayer. Landwirt. Jahrb. 66, 15-26.
- Koike J, Sh(ô)ji S and Yoshida S 1975 Aboveground biomass and litter in the Miscanthus sinensiscommunity. JIBP Synth.13, 141-147.
- Kolb W, Hotz A and Kuhn W 1990 Untersuchungen zur Leistungsf (ä)higkeit ausdauernder Gr(ä)ser f(ü)r die Energie-und Rohstoffgewinnung. Rasen-Turf-Gazon 4, 75-79.
- Midorikawa B 1978 Method to determine primary production. InHandbook of Grassland Investigation. Ed. M Numata. pp 61- 77. Univ. of Tokyo Press, Tokyo.
- Midorikawa B and Masuzawa T 1978 Studies on production processes and net production of the community. JIBP Synth. 19, 222-230.
- Midorikawa B, Shimada Y, Iwaki H and Ohga N 1975 Root production in seminatural grassland community dominated by Miscanthus sinensisin Kawatabi area. JIBP Synth.13, 114-123.
- Nygaard Nielsen P 1988 Produktiviteten of elefantengras Miscanthus sinensis 'Giganteus' pa farskellige jordtyper. Saertryk Tidsskrift Planteavl 91, 275-281.
- Schweiger P and Stolzenburg K 1993 Energie vom Acker-Anbauversuche mit Miscanthusin der Rheinebene 1989-1993. Informationen f(ü)r die Pflanzenproduktion Heft 1. Ed. Landesanstalt f(ü)r Pflanzenbau, Forchheim.
- Shimada Y, Iwaki H and Midorikawa B 1975 Primary productivity of the Miscanthus sinensiscommunity at the Kawatabi IBP area-standing crop of aboveground parts. JIBP Synth. 13, 110-114.
- Thiemann R 1995 Produktionstechnik von Miscanthus. InSymposium Miscanthus. Biomassebereitstellung, energetische und stoffliche Nutzung. Schriftenr. Nachwachs. Rohstoffe 4, 103- 112.
- Thoma H 1991 Pflanzenbauliche, erntetechnische, verbrennungstechnische, (ö)kologische und (ö)konomische Aspekte der energetischen Nutzung von Einjahrespflanzen durch direkte Verbrennung. Bayer. Landwirtsch. Jahrb. 68, 916-988.
Metadata
- Authors
- Himken, M., Lammel, J., Neukirchen, D., Czypionka-Krause, U., & Olfs, H.-W.
- Affiliations
- Norsk Hydro (Germany) (DE)
- ORCID
- Olfs, H.-W.
- Venue
- Plant and Soil
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 189
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117-126
- ISSN
- 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5036
- OpenAlex
- W1277224153
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Plant and Soil (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Keywords
- Miscanthus, nutrient remobilization, nutrient uptake, dry matter production, nitrogen fertilization, rhizome, senescence, nutrient balance, energy crops, renewable energy crops, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review