Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 37Soil and Water Nutrient DynamicsSoil and Unsaturated FlowSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

N rate and transport under variable cropping history and fertilizer rate on loamy sand and clay loam soils: II. Performance of LEACHMN using different calibration scenarios

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1004827200714

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Addiscott T M, Whitmore A P and Powlson D S 1991 Farming, fertilizer, and the nitrate problem. C.A.B International, Wallingford, UK.
  2. Cornell Nutrient Analysis Laboratories 1987 Phosphorus and nitrate calorimetric determinations by autoanlyzer. In Methods for Soil Fertility Analysis. Eds. M C McCenahan and G A Ferguson. pp 7–16. Procedure No s1101. Cornell Univ. Ithaca, NY.
  3. Cornell Nutrient Analysis Laboratories 1989 Extraction of soil for ‘available’ nutrients. In Methods for Soil Fertility Analysis. Eds. M C McCenahan and G A Ferguson. pp 3–6. Procedure No s1100. Cornell Univ. Ithaca, NY.
  4. Hutson J L and Wagenet R J 1992 LEACHM Leaching Estimation And Chemistry Model: A process-based model of water and solute movement, transformations, plant uptake, and chemical reactions in the unsaturated zone. Version 3. Dept. of Soil, Crop and Atmospheric Sciences. Research series 92-3. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.
  5. Jemison J M Jr 1991 Nitrate leaching from soil measured with zerotension pan lysimeters as influenced by nitrogen fertilizer rate and manure application: Field estimates and model predictions. Ph.D. diss. Pennsylvania State Univ, Univ. Park.
  6. Nofziger D L and Hornsby A G 1986 A microcomputer-based management tool for chemical movement in soil. Appl. Agric. Res. 1, 50–56.
  7. Wagenet R J and Huston J L 1989 LEACHiM: leaching estimation and chemistry model. Ver. 2. Cornell University. Ithaca, NY.

Cited by

See all 37

Metadata

Authors
Sogbedji, J. M., van Es, H. M., Hutson, J. L., & Geohring, L. D.
Affiliations
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • Cornell University (US)
Venue
Plant and Soil
Published
2001-02
Volume
229
Issue
1
Pages
71-82
ISSN
  • 0032-079X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5036
OpenAlex
W277199646
Cited by
34
References
18
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Plant and Soil (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
nitrogen leaching, nitrate nitrogen, maize, model calibration, soil type, loamy sand soil, clay loam soil, nitrogen uptake, nitrogen application rate, cropping history, model validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: N rate and transport under variable cropping history and fertilizer rate on loamy sand and clay loam soils: II. Performance of LEACHMN using different calibration scenarios. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1004827200714
The paper
Sogbedji, J. M., van Es, H. M., Hutson, J. L., & Geohring, L. D. (2001). N rate and transport under variable cropping history and fertilizer rate on loamy sand and clay loam soils: II. Performance of LEACHMN using different calibration scenarios. Plant and Soil. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1004827200714

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.