The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Dissociation of force production from MHC and actin contents in muscles injured by eccentric contractions
Abstract
The primary purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between myosin heavy chain (MHC) and actin contents and maximum isometric tetanic force (Po) in mouse extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles following eccentric contraction-induced injury. Po and protein contents were measured in injured (n = 80) and contralateral control (n = 80) EDL muscles at the following time points after in vivo injury: sham, 0, 0.25, 1, 3, 5, 14, and 28 days. Po was reduced by 37 +/- 2.3% to 49 +/- 3.8% (p < or = 0.05), while MHC and actin contents were unaltered from 0 to 3 days after injury. Whereas Po partially recovered between 3 and 5 days (from -49 +/- 3.8% to -35 +/- 3.6%), MHC and actin contents in the injured muscles declined by 19 +/- 4.9% and 20 +/- 5.3%, respectively, by 5 days compared with control muscles. Decrements in Po were similar to the reductions in MHC and actin contents at 14 (approximately 24%) and 28 (approximately 11%) days. Evaluation of myofibrillar and soluble protein fractions indicated significant reductions in the content of major proteins at 5 and 14 days. Immunoblots of heat shock protein 72 revealed elevations starting at 0.25 days, peaking during 1-3 days, and declining after 5 days. These findings indicate that decreased contractile protein content is not related to the initial decrease in Po. However, decreased MHC and actin contents could account for 58% of the Po reduction at 5 days, and for nearly all the decrements in Po from 14 to 28 days.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The force-producing capabilities of the muscle usually return to baseline (pre-injury) levels between 2 and 4 weeks post-eccentric contraction-induced injury (34, 42, 44, 46, 47).”
From Phytoecdysteroids Accelerate Recovery of Skeletal Muscle Function Following in vivo Eccentric Contraction-Induced Injury in Adult and Old Mice (2021) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“Here in this study, as with many others (34, 35, 42–44), we reaffirm that functional capacity is significantly impaired immediately, and for several days after, 150 eccentric contractions.”
From Phytoecdysteroids Accelerate Recovery of Skeletal Muscle Function Following in vivo Eccentric Contraction-Induced Injury in Adult and Old Mice (2021) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, there is sufficient evidence that alterations in skeletal muscle protein metabolism may be responsible for the remaining strength deficits in the 1–2 weeks after eccentric damage (34, 42).”
From Phytoecdysteroids Accelerate Recovery of Skeletal Muscle Function Following in vivo Eccentric Contraction-Induced Injury in Adult and Old Mice (2021) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“The novel observation that 20E treatment fully recovers skeletal muscle function in just 7 days after eccentric damage is much earlier than other studies using similar eccentric damage protocols in mice (34, 35, 42, 47).”
From Phytoecdysteroids Accelerate Recovery of Skeletal Muscle Function Following in vivo Eccentric Contraction-Induced Injury in Adult and Old Mice (2021) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
The citation lists are queued
They are fetched later and appear here then.
References 43 · Cited by 91
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Doherty, F. J. & Mayer, R. J. (1992) The mechanismspathways of intracellular proteolysis. In Intracellular Protein Degradation (edited by Rickwood, D. & Male, D.) pp. 15–32. New York: Oxford University Press.
Metadata
- Authors
- Ingalls, C. P., Warren, G. L., & Armstrong, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Texas A&M University System (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 215-224
- ISSN
- 0142-4319 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2657
- OpenAlex
- W62577265
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ar042761-03)
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR-42761)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Exercise and Physiological Responses
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Keywords
- myosin heavy chain, actin, extensor digitorum longus, muscle force production, HSP72, myofibrillar proteins, muscle recovery, muscle damage
- MeSH terms
- Actins, Animals, Female, Heat-Shock Proteins, Isometric Contraction, Mice, Inbred ICR, Myofibrils, Time Factors, Muscle, Skeletal, Myelin P0 Protein, Myosin Heavy Chains, HSP72 Heat-Shock Proteins, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review