Cited by 48BRCA gene mutations in cancerBreast Lesions and CarcinomasMultiple and Secondary Primary Cancers

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Survival and tumor characteristics of German hereditary breast cancer patients

Hamann, Ute, Sinn, Hans-Peter·2000·Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Abstract

Reports from different countries have been inconclusive in attempting to relate the BRCA1 mutation status to the survival of breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate overall and disease-free survival for German hereditary breast cancer patients. Data on clinical outcome and data on age at diagnosis of breast cancer, histology, tumor size, lymph node status, histological grade, and laterality of 36 breast cancer patients from 12 families with a BRCA1 mutation and from one family with strong evidence for linkage to BRCA1 were compared with those of 49 hereditary breast cancer patients from 23 families that did not harbor a BRCA1 mutation. Overall and disease-free survival was estimated for both groups. BRCA1 mutation carriers had a significantly earlier age of diagnosis than non-carriers (p = 0.0001) and more frequently developed contralateral breast cancer (p = 0.04). Also, BRCA1-associated tumors more frequently were of larger size (p = 0.041) and higher grade of malignancy (p = 0.005) than non-BRCA1-associated tumors. Whereas no difference in overall survival was seen, disease-free survival at 10 years differed significantly with 53.3% for BRCA1 mutation carriers and 76% for non-carriers (p = 0.02). However, after stratification for age and in multivariate analysis for mutation status, age, and bilaterality, it was shown that the worse prognosis for BRCA1 mutation carriers disappeared. Our results suggest that the worse prognosis of BRCA1 mutation…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1006350518190

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

The citation lists are queued

They are fetched later and appear here then.

References 42 · Cited by 48

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Bevölkerungsbezogener Krebsregister in Deutschland: Krebs in Deutschland. Häufigkeiten und Trends. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Bevölkerungsbezogener Krebsregister in Deutschland (Hrsg), Saarbücken, 1997

Metadata

Authors
Hamann, U., & Sinn, H.-P.
Affiliations
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Published
2000-01
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
185-192
ISSN
  • 0167-6806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7217
OpenAlex
W2078493457
Cited by
48
References
42
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
Keywords
hereditary breast cancer, BRCA1 mutation, disease-free survival, overall survival, age at diagnosis, contralateral breast cancer, tumor size, histological grade, prognostic factors, German patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Neoplasms, DNA Mutational Analysis, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, Survival Analysis, Point Mutation, Age of Onset, Genes, BRCA1, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review