Cited by 116Sarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentBone Tumor Diagnosis and TreatmentsOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Long-term follow-up and post-relapse survival in patients with non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Open access
Ferrari, S., Bacci, G., Picci, P., Mercuri, M., Briccoli, A., Pinto, D., Gasbarrini, A., Tienghi, A., Brach del Prever, A.·1997·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

Background Most of the studies of the treatment of non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity have reported results in terms of probability of survival up to five years with a minimum follow-up of less than two to three years. Definition of reliable indicators of prognosis and predictive factors for survival require mature data derived from a long-term survival analysis. Patients and methods A review of 127 patients with non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity, treated between March 1983 and June 1986, was performed. The treatment protocol consisted of primary chemotherapy with MTX (randomization to high vs. moderate dosages) and CDP followed by surgery. Postoperatively, patients with < 60% tumor necrosis received ADM and BCD; those with tumor necrosis > or = 60% < 90% (Fair Responders FR) were given MTX, CDP and ADM. Up to January 1984, patients with tumor necrosis > 90% received MTX and CDP only, and after then they were given the same treatment as for FR. A multivariate analysis to test predictive factors for survival was performed. Results With a median follow-up of 134 months (range 114-153), the 12-year DFS was 46%. A good histologic response, an LDH baseline value within the normal range, and the use of high-dose MTX were positive predictive factors for DFS. With a median time of observation for survivors of 130 months, the 12-year overall survival was 53%. None of the patients who relapsed with local or distant recurrences other than lung metastasis are now alive. Patients with a relapse-free interval longer than 24 months had a significantly better post-relapse survival than those with a shorter relapse-free interval (40% vs. 7%; P = 0.0159). All of the patients who were not surgically treated had disease progression and died within 40 months after the first recurrence. The surgically-treated patients had a 30% post-relapse survival probability. Conclusions In non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity, chemotherapy-induced tumor necrosis, the baseline LDH serum value and the use of HDMTX are significant predictive factors for DFS. The relapse-free interval and the possibility of metastasectomy are significant factors conditioning the post-relapse survival.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1008221713505

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Link, 1986, The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on relapse-free survival in patients with osteosarcoma of the extremity, N Engl J Med, 314, 1600, 10.1056/NEJM198606193142502 · DOI
  2. Eilber, 1987, Adjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma: A randomized prospective trial, J Clin Oncol, 5, 21, 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.1.21 · DOI
  3. Rosen, 1979, Primary osteogenic sarcoma: The rationale for preoperative chemotherapy and delayed surgery, Cancer, 43, 2163, 10.1002/1097-0142(197906)43:6<2163::AID-CNCR2820430602>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  4. Jaffe, 1985, Control of primary osteosarcoma with chemotherapy, Cancer, 56, 461, 10.1002/1097-0142(19850801)56:3<461::AID-CNCR2820560308>3.0.CO;2-L · DOI
  5. Winkler, 1984, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteogenic sarcoma: Results of a cooperative German/Austrian study, J Clin Oncol, 2, 617, 10.1200/JCO.1984.2.6.617 · DOI
  6. Campanacci, 1981, The treatment of osteosarcoma of the extremity: Twenty years’ experience at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Cancer, 48, 1456, 10.1002/1097-0142(19811001)48:7<1569::AID-CNCR2820480717>3.0.CO;2-X · DOI
  7. Link, 1991, Adjuvant chemotherapy of high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremity. Updated results of the Multi-Institutional Osteosarcoma Study, Clin Orthop, 270, 8, 10.1097/00003086-199109000-00003 · DOI
  8. Bacci, 1990, Primary chemotherapy and delayed surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) for osteosarcoma of the extremity, The Istituto Rizzoli experience in 127 patients treated preoperatively with intravenous methotrexate (high versus moderate doses) and i.a. cisplatin. Cancer, 65, 2539
  9. Enneking, 1980, Current concepts review, The surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. J Bone and Joint Sur, 62A, 1027, 10.2106/00004623-198062060-00028 · DOI
  10. Picci, 1985, Histologic evaluation of necrosis in osteosarcoma induced by chemotherapy, Regional mapping of viable and nonviable tumor. Cancer, 56, 1515
  11. Rosen, 1982, Preoperative chemotherapy for osteogenic sarcoma, Selection of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy based on the response of the primary tumor to preoperative chemotherapy. Cancer, 49, 1221
  12. Provisor, 1997, Treatment of non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity with preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy: A report from the Children’s Cancer Group, J Clin Oncol, 15, 76, 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.1.76 · DOI
  13. Saeter, 1991, Treatment of osteosarcoma of the extremities with the T-10 Protocol, with emphasis on the effects of preoperative chemotherapy with single agent high dose methotrexate: A Scandinavian Sarcoma Group study, J Clin Oncol, 9, 1766, 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.10.1766 · DOI
  14. Winkler, 1988, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of osteosarcoma: Results of a randomized cooperative trial (COSS-82) with salvage chemotherapy based on histological tumor response, J Clin Oncol, 6, 329, 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.2.329 · DOI
  15. Bacci, 1996, Methotrexate serum concentration and histological response to multiagent primary chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the limbs, J Chemotherapy, 8, 472, 10.1179/joc.1996.8.6.472 · DOI
  16. Ferrari, 1993, Serum methotrexate concentration and prognosis in patients with osteosarcoma ot the extremities treated with a multidrug neoadjuvant regimen, J Chemother, 5, 135, 10.1080/1120009X.1993.11739222 · DOI
  17. Graf, 1994, Methotrexate pharmacokinetics and prognosis in osteosarcoma, J Clin Oncol, 12, 1443, 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.7.1443 · DOI
  18. Delepine, 1995, Dose escalation with pharmacokinetics monitoring in methotrexate chemotherapy of osteosarcoma, Anticancer Res, 15, 489
  19. Delepine, 1996, Influence of methotrexate dose intensity on outcome of patients with high grade osteogenic osteosarcoma, Cancer, 78, 2127, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961115)78:10<2127::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI
  20. Bramwell, 1992, A comparison of two short intensive adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in operable osteosarcoma of limbs in children and young adults: The first study of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup, J Clin Oncol, 10, 1579, 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.10.1579 · DOI
  21. Souhami, 1996, A randomized trial of two regimens of chemotherapy in operable osteosarcoma: A study of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup (EOI), Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 15, 520
  22. Meyers, 1992, Chemotherapy for non-metastatic osteogenic sarcoma: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Experience, J Clin Oncol,, 10, 5, 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.1.5 · DOI
  23. Bacci, 1993, Primary chemotherapy and delayed surgery for non metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity, Results in 164 patients preoperatively treated with high doses of methotrexate, followed by cisplatin and doxorubicin. Cancer, 72, 1216
  24. Benjamin, 1995, The value of ifosfamide in postoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy of osteosarcoma, Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 14, 516
  25. Petrilli, 1991, Increased survival, limb preservation and prognostic factors for osteosarcoma, Cancer, 68, 733, 10.1002/1097-0142(19910815)68:4<733::AID-CNCR2820680412>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI
  26. Glasser, 1992, Survival, prognosis, and therapeutic response in osteogenic sarcoma, Cancer, 69, 698, 10.1002/1097-0142(19920201)69:3<698::AID-CNCR2820690317>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
  27. Bieling, 1996, Tumor size and prognosis in aggressively treated osteosarcoma, J Clin Oncol, 14, 848, 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.3.848 · DOI
  28. Saeter, 1995, Systemic relapse of patients with osteogenic sarcoma, Prognostic factors for long term survival. Cancer, 75, 1084
  29. Winkler, 1992, Die Chemotherapie des osteosarkoms, Z Orthop, 130, 285, 10.1055/s-2008-1039619 · DOI
  30. Ward, 1994, Pulmonary metastases of stage IIB extremity osteosarcoma and subsequent pulmonary metastases, J Clin Oncol, 12, 1849, 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.9.1849 · DOI
  31. Beron, 1988, Prognosis after metastasis in osteosarcoma: experience from the COSS studies, Contr Oncol, 30, 143, 10.1159/000415839 · DOI
  32. Huth, 1989, Patterns of recurrence after resection of osteosarcoma of the extremity, Arch Surg, 124, 122, 10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410010132026 · DOI
  33. Chawla, 1990, Role of high-dose ifosphamide (HDI) in recurrent osteosarcoma, Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 9, 310
  34. Picci, 1996, Salvage treatment with high-dose ifosfamide and surgery for osteosarcoma patients relapsed with lung metastases, Preliminary results. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 15, 459
  35. Kleinerman, 1992, Phase II study of Liposomal Muramyl Tripeptide in osteosarcoma: the cytokine cascade and monocyte activation following administration, J Clin Oncol, 10, 1310, 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.8.1310 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Sekyi-Otu, 1993, Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) responsivity of human sarcomas: Correlation of IGF-I receptor gene expression measured by RT-PCr with IGF-I binding capacity, Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 12, 121

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ferrari, S., Bacci, G., Picci, P., Mercuri, M., Briccoli, A., Pinto, D., Gasbarrini, A., Tienghi, A., & Brach del Prever, A.
Affiliations
  • Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli (IT)
  • Ospedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna (IT)
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-08
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
765-771
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146989709
Cited by
116
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Università di Bologna
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
non-metastatic osteosarcoma, extremity osteosarcoma, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, high-dose methotrexate, CDP, doxorubicin, tumor necrosis, prognostic factors, recurrence-free interval, survival after relapse, metastasectomy, long-term survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, serum lactate dehydrogenase
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Child, Child, Preschool, Cisplatin, Extremities, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, L-Lactate Dehydrogenase, Male, Methotrexate, Osteosarcoma, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Disease-Free Survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review