Cited by 56Reproductive Biology and FertilityOvarian function and disordersReproductive Health and Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Clinical Assisted Reproduction: High FSH:LH Ratio and Low LH Levels in Basal Cycle Day 3: Impact on Follicular Development and IVF Outcome

Open access
Barroso, Gerardo, Oehninger, Sergio, Monzó, Ana, Kolm, Paul, Gibbons, William E., Muasher, Suheil J.·2001·Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Abstract

Purpose To examine the impact of low basal cycle day 3 serum LH levels or a high FSH:LH ratio on IVF results. Methods A homogeneous group of patients was analyzed as identified by normal basal cycle of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), Luteinizing hormone (LH), and estradiol (E2) levels. High responders (high LH:FSH ratio) and low responders (high FSH or E2 levels, and women > or = 42 years of age) were excluded from analysis. Only cycles stimulated with a combination of a GnRHa (luteal suppression) and pure FSH were studied. Results Patients with low basal LH levels (< 3 mIU/mL) did not differ significantly from controls in terms of response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation but there was a clear trend toward poorer implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. On the other hand, patients with a high FSH:LH ratio (> 3) had significantly fewer mature oocytes aspirated, and lower implantation and clinical pregnancy rates than patients with gonadotropin ratio < or = 3. These negative effects were evident in the presence of normal basal FSH levels and after adequate matching of female's age and number of embryos transferred. Conclusions These studies highlight a negative impact of a basal cycle high FSH:LH ratio (and possibly low LH levels) on follicular development and oocyte quality in these patients subjected to pituitary down-regulation followed by pure FSH administration. A high FSH:LH ratio may be therefore used as an early biomarker of poor ovarian response.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1016601110424

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A basal cycle high FSH:LH ratio (and possibly low LH levels) has a negative impact on follicular development and oocyte quality.

    “Other studies have highlighted a negative impact of a basal cycle high FSH:LH ratio (and possibly low LH levels) on follicular development and oocyte quality [33].”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Ben Rafael Z, Feldberg D: The poor responder patient in an in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. J Assist Reprod Genet 1993;10:118-120 · DOI
  2. Muasher SJ: Controversies in assisted reproduction: Treatment of low responders. J Assist Reprod Genet 1993;10:112-114 · DOI
  3. Muasher SJ, Oehninger S, Simonetti S, Matta J, Ellis LM, Liu HC: The value of basal and/or stimulated serum gonadotropin levels in prediction of stimulation response and in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1988;50:298-307 · DOI
  4. Scott RT, Toner JP, Muasher SJ, Oehninger S, Robinson S, Rosenwaks Z: Follicle-stimulating hormone levels on cycle day 3 are predictive of in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1989;51:651-654 · DOI
  5. Toner JP, Philput CB, Jones GS, Muasher SJ: Basal follicle stimulating hormone level is better predictor of in vitro fertilization performance than age. Fertil Steril 1991;55:784-791 · DOI
  6. Oehninger S, Veeck L, Lanzendorf S, Maloney M, Toner JP, Muasher SJ: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): Achievement of high pregnancy rates in couples with severe male factor infertility is dependent upon female and not male factor. Fertil Steril 1995;64:977-981 · DOI
  7. Padilla SL, Bayati J, Garcia JE: Prognostic value of the early serum estradiol response to leuprolide acetate in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1990;53:288-294 · DOI
  8. Meyer WR, Lavy G, DeCherney AH, Visintin I, Economy K, Luborsky JL: Evidence of gonadal and gonadotropin antibodies in women with a suboptimal ovarian response to exogenous gonadotropin. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:795-799
  9. Pellicer A, Ardiles G, Neuspilles F, Remohi J, Simon C, Bonilla-Musoles F: Evaluation of the ovarian reserve in young low responders with normal basal levels of follicle-stimulating hormone using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Fertil Steril 1998;70:671-675 · DOI
  10. Taymor ML: The regulation of follicle growth: Some clinical implications in reproductive endocrinology. Fertil Steril 1996;65:235-247 · DOI
  11. Murkherjee T, Copperman A, Lapinsky R, Sandler B, Bustillo M, Grunfeld L: An elevated day three follicle-stimulating hormone: Luteinizing hormone ratio (FSH:LH) in the presence of a normal day 3 FSH predicts a poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril 1996;65:588-593 · DOI
  12. Nocci I, Biagiotti R, Maggi M, Ricci F, Ciannotti A, Scarcelli G: Lowday 3 luteinizing hormone values are predictive of reduced response to ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod 1998;13:531-534 · DOI
  13. Muasher SJ: Use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. Clin Ther 1992;14(Suppl A):74-86
  14. Smotrich DB, Widra EA, Gindoff PR, Levy MJ, Hall JL, Stillman RJ: Prognostic value of day 3 estradiol on in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1995;64:1136-1140 · DOI
  15. Navot D, Rosenwaks Z, Margalioth EJ: Prognostic assessment of female fecundity. Lancet 1987;2:645-647 · DOI
  16. Syrop CH, Willhoite A, Van Voorhis BJ: Ovarian volume: A novel outcome predictor for assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 1995;64:1167-1171 · DOI
  17. Zaidi J, Barber J, Kyei-Mensah A, Bekir J, Campbell S, Tan SL: Relationship of ovarian stromal blood flow at the baseline ultrasound scan to subsequent follicular response in an in vitro fertilization program. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:779-784 · DOI
  18. Mercan R, Mayer JF, Walker D, Jones S, Oehninger S, Toner JP, Muasher SJ: Improved oocyte quality is obtained with follicle stimulating hormone alone than with follicle stimulating hormone/human menopausal gonadotropin combination. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1886-1889 · DOI
  19. Winslow KL, Toner JP, Brzyski RG, Oehninger S, Acosta AA, Muasher SJ: The gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist stimulation test-a sensitive predictor of performance in the flare-up in vitro fertilization cycle. Fertil Steril 1991;56:711-717 · DOI
  20. Seifer DB, Lambert-Messerlian G, Hogan JW, Gardiner A, Berk C: Day 3 serum inhibin-B is a predictive of assisted reproductive technologies outcome. Fertil Steril 1997;67:110-114 · DOI
  21. Meldrum DR, Tsao Z, Monroe SE, Braunstein GD, Sladek J, Lu JKH: Stimulating of LH fragments with reduced bioactivity following GnRH agonist administration in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1984;58:755-757 · DOI
  22. Loumaye E, Engrand P, Howles CM, O'Dea L: Assessment of the role of serum luteinizing hormone and estradiol response to follicle stimulation hormone on in vitro fertilization treatment outcome. Fertil Steril 1997;67:889-899 · DOI
  23. Develioglu OH, Cox B, Toner JP, Oehninger S, Muasher SJ: The value of basal serum follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone and estradiol levels, following pituitary downregulation, in predicting ovarian response to stimulation with highly purified FSH for in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1168-1174 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Barroso, G., Oehninger, S., Monzó, A., Kolm, P., Gibbons, W. E., & Muasher, S. J.
Affiliations
Eastern Virginia Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Oehninger, Sergio
Venue
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Published
2001-09
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
499-505
ISSN
  • 0740-7769 (ISSN-L)
  • 1058-0468
  • 1573-7330
OpenAlex
W1553563204
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
FSH/LH ratio, luteinizing hormone, folliculogenesis, oocyte quality, IVF outcomes, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, GnRH agonist down-regulation, poor ovarian response, biomarkers, estradiol
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Ovarian Follicle, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone, Ovulation Induction, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Pregnancy Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review