Cited by 1,857Data Stream Mining TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMachine Learning and Algorithms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Learning in the Presence of Concept Drift and Hidden Contexts

Open access
Widmer, Gerhard, Kubat, Miroslav·1996·Machine Learning

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1018046501280

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

The citation lists are queued

They are fetched later and appear here then.

References 45 · Cited by 1,857

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Angluin. D (1988). Queries and Concept Lenlling. Machine l.earning 2(4), 319 342.
  2. Hecht-Nielsen R. (1990). Neurcomputing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
  3. Langley. P., & Iba, W. (1993) Average-case Analysis of a Nearest Neghbor Algorithm Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artifiical Intelligence (pp.889–894) San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann

Metadata

Authors
Widmer, G., & Kubat, M.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Venue
Machine Learning
Published
1996-04
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
69-101
ISSN
  • 0885-6125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0565
OpenAlex
W2022775778
Cited by
1,857
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 102 · 2012: 87
FWCI
7.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Machine Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
concept drift, online learning, noisy data, conceptual change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning in the Presence of Concept Drift and Hidden Contexts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1018046501280
The paper
Widmer, G., & Kubat, M. (1996). Learning in the Presence of Concept Drift and Hidden Contexts. Machine Learning. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1018046501280