The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Learning in the Presence of Concept Drift and Hidden Contexts
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
The citation lists are queued
They are fetched later and appear here then.
References 45 · Cited by 1,857
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Angluin. D (1988). Queries and Concept Lenlling. Machine l.earning 2(4), 319 342.
- Hecht-Nielsen R. (1990). Neurcomputing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
- Langley. P., & Iba, W. (1993) Average-case Analysis of a Nearest Neghbor Algorithm Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artifiical Intelligence (pp.889–894) San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann
Metadata
- Authors
- Widmer, G., & Kubat, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Vienna (AT)
- ORCID
- Widmer, Gerhard
- Venue
- Machine Learning
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-101
- ISSN
- 0885-6125 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0565
- OpenAlex
- W2022775778
- Cited by
- 1,857
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 74 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 102 · 2012: 87
- FWCI
- 7.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Machine Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Keywords
- concept drift, online learning, noisy data, conceptual change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning in the Presence of Concept Drift and Hidden Contexts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1018046501280
- The paper
- Widmer, G., & Kubat, M. (1996). Learning in the Presence of Concept Drift and Hidden Contexts. Machine Learning. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1018046501280