The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modelling of Materials Policies
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In other words, some of the benefits of textile recycling might be counteracted by increased consumption (a”
From Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review (2018) · cites this paper as Gielen and Moriguchi, 2002
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- E. Matthews et al., The Weight of Nations. Material Outflows from Industrial Economies (World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, US, 2000).
- F. Duchin, G.M. Lange, K. Thonstad and A. Idenburg, The Future of the Environment. Ecological Economics and Technological Change (Oxford University Press, New York, 1994).
- R.U. Ayres, K. Martinas and L.U. Ayres, An overview of ecothermodynamics: Exergy and life cycle analysis, Energy 23(5) (1997) 355–363. · DOI
- D.J. Gielen and J. Pieters, Instruments and Technologies for Climate Change Policy. An Integrated Energy and Materials Systems Modelling Approach, ENV/EPOC/GEEI(99) 15 (OECD, Paris, 2001).
- P. Kandelaars and J. van den Bergh, A Survey of Physical Flows in Economic Models, TI97-108/3 (Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam, 1997).
- D.J. Gielen, Materialising dematerialisation. Integrated energy and materials systems engineering for greenhouse gas emission mitigation, Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, Design for Sustainability program, 1999.
- C. Hanisch, Is extended producer responsibility effective?, Environmental Science and Technology 34(7) (2000) 170 A–175 A. · DOI
- A. Brooke, D. Kendrick and A. Meeraus, GAMS Release 2.25. A User's Quide (Boyd and Fraser Publishing Co., Danvers, MA, 1992).
- D.J. Gielen and H. Yagita, Assessment of CO2 emission reduction strategies for the Japanese petrochemical industry, Journal of Industrial Ecology 4(3) (2001) (in press). · DOI
- E. Staudt and M. Schroll, The German packaging ordinance: The questionable effect of a fragmentary solid waste management approach, Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 1 (1999) 17–24.
- R. Loulou and D. Lavigne, MARKAL model with elastic demands: Application to greenhouse gas emission control, in: Operations Research and Environmental Management, eds. C. Carraro and A. Haurie (1996) pp. 201–220. · DOI
- C.J. Cleveland and M. Ruth, Indicators of dematerialization and the materials intensity of use, Journal of Industrial Ecology 2(3) (1998) 15–50. · DOI
- K. Palmer, H. Sigman and M. Walls, The cost of reducing municipal solid waste, Journal of Environmnetal Economics and Management 33 (1997) 128–150. · DOI
- D.J. Gielen, Potential CO2 emissions in the Netherlands due to carbon storage in materials and products, Ambio 26(2) (1997) 101–106.
- D.J. Gielen and Y. Moriguchi, The Interaction of Environmental Policies. A Case Study for Japan (National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan, 2001). Available via Internet: http://www. resourcemodels.org/
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review
Sandin, G., & Peters, G. M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266 · Cited by 1,087
“The exception is Liang et al. (2012), who study the environmental impact of paper produced from various waste materials and conclude that textile waste is a questionable feedstock compared to other waste materials (for the technological pathways studied).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Gielen, D. J., & Moriguchi, Y.
- Affiliations
- National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP)
- Venue
- Environmental Modeling & Assessment
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 231-241
- ISSN
- 1420-2026 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2967
- OpenAlex
- W2044572021
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Modeling & Assessment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Keywords
- materials policy, waste management policy, petrochemical industry, policy evaluation, pricing instruments, carbon tax, subsidies, rebound effect, waste streams
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review