CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,047Economic and Environmental ValuationTransportation Planning and OptimizationDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Mixed Logit model: The state of practice

Hensher, David A., Greene, William H.·2003·Transportation
DOI 10.1023/a:1022558715350
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1022558715350

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Armstrong P, Garrido R & Ortuzar J de D (2001) Confidence intervals to bound the value of time. Transportation Research 37E: 143-161. · DOI
  2. Bhat CR (2000) Flexible model structures for discrete choice analysis. In: Hensher DA & Button KJ (eds) Handbook of Transport Modelling, Volume 1, of Handbooks in Transport (pp 71-90). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  3. Bhat CR (2001) Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model. Transportation Research 35B: 677-695. · DOI
  4. Bhat CR (in press) Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomised and scrambled Halton sequences. Transportation Research.
  5. Bhat CR & Castelar S (2002) A unified mixed logit framework for modeling revealed and stated preferences: formulation and application to congestion pricing analysis in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Research 36B: 593-616. · DOI
  6. Boersch-Supan A & Hajvassiliou V (1990) Smooth unbiased multivariate probability simula-tors for maximum likelihood estimation of limited dependent variable models. Journal of Econometrics 58: 347-368. · DOI
  7. Brownstone D (2001) Discrete choice modelling for transportation. In Hensher DA (ed) Travel Behaviour Research: The Leading Edge (pp 97-124). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  8. Brownstone D & Train K (1999) Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns. Journal of Econometrics 89: 109-129. · DOI
  9. Brownstone D, Bunch DS & Train K (2000) Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles. Transportation Research 34B: 315-338. · DOI
  10. Carrasco JA & Ortuzar J de D (2002) Review and assessment of the nested logit model. Transport Reviews 22: 197-218. · DOI
  11. Daniels R & Hensher DA (2000) Valuation of environmental impacts of transportation projects: the challenge of self-interest proximity. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 34 (May): 189-214.
  12. DeShazo JR & Fermo G (2002) Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: the effects of complexity on choice consistency. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44: 123-143. · DOI
  13. Evans M, Hastings N & Peacock B (1993) Statistical Distributions. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  14. Geweke J, Keane M & Runkle D (1994) Alternative computational approaches to inference in the multinomial probit model. Review of Economics and Statistics LXXVI: 609-632. · DOI
  15. Greene WH (2002) Econometric Analysis, 5th edition. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  16. Greene WH & Hensher DA (2003) A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research B. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Halton JH (1960) On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multidimensional integrals. Numerische Math 2: 84-90 and corrigenda 196. · DOI
  18. Hensher DA (2001a) Measurement of the valuation of travel time savings. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (Special Issue in Honour of Michael Beesley) 35: 71-98.
  19. Hensher DA (2001b) The valuation of commuter travel time savings for car drivers in New Zealand: evaluating alternative model specifications. Transportation 28, 101-118. · DOI
  20. Hensher, D.A. and Johnson, L.W. (1981) Applied Discrete Choice Modelling, Croom Helm (London) and Wiley (New York).
  21. Hensher DA, Louviere JJ & Swait J (1999) Combining sources of preference data. Journal of Econometrics 89: 197-221. · DOI
  22. Hensher DA & Sullivan C (2003) Willingness to pay for road curviness and road type for long distance travel in New Zealand. Transportation Research D. · DOI
  23. Huber J & Train K (2001) On the similarity of classical and Bayesian estimates of individual mean partworths. Marketing Letters 12 (August): 259-270. · DOI
  24. Koop G & Poirier DJ (1993) Bayesian analysis of logit models using natural conjugate priors. Journal of Econometrics 56: 323-340. · DOI
  25. Koppelman F & Sethi V (2000) Closed-form discrete-choice models. In: Hensher DA & Button KJ (eds) Handbook of Transport Modelling, Volume 1, of Handbooks in Transport (pp 211-222). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  26. Louviere JJ & Hensher DA (2001) Combining sources of preference data. In: Hensher DA (ed) Travel Behaviour Research: The Leading Edge (pp 125-144). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  27. Louviere JJ, Hensher DA & Swait JF (2000) Stated Choice Methods and Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  28. Louviere J, Carson R, Ainslie A, Cameron T, DeShazo JR, Hensher D, Kohn R, Marley T & Street D (2002) Dissecting the random component of utility, Workshop Report for the Asilomar Invitational Choice Symposium, California. Marketing Letters 13(3): 177-194. 174 · DOI
  29. McFadden D (2001) Disaggregate Behavioural Travel Demand's RUM Side - A 30 years retrospective. In: Hensher DA (ed) Travel Behaviour Research: The Leading Edge (pp 17-64). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  30. McFadden D & Ruud PA (1994) Estimation by simulation. Review of Economics and Statistics LXXVI(4): 591-608. · DOI
  31. McFadden D & Train K (2000) Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15: 447-470. · DOI
  32. Revelt D & Train K (1998) Mixed Logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics 80: 1-11. · DOI
  33. Rizzi LI & Ortuzar J de D (2002) Stated preference in the valuation of interurban road safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, in press. · DOI
  34. Sandor Z & Train K (2002) Quasi-random Simulation of Discrete Choice Models. Department of Economics, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley.
  35. Stern S (1997) Simulation-based estimation. Journal of Economic Literature XXXV (December), 2006-2039.
  36. Swait J & Adamowicz W (2001) Choice complexity and decision strategy selection. Journal of Consumer Research 28: 135-148. · DOI
  37. Train K (1997) Mixed logit models for recreation demand. In: Kling C & Herriges J (eds) Valuing the Environment Using Recreation Demand Models. New York: Elgar Press.
  38. Train K (1998) Recreation demand models with taste differences over people. Land Economics 74: 230-239 · DOI
  39. Train K (1999) Halton Sequences for Mixed Logit. Working paper. Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
  40. Train K (2001) A comparison of hierarchical Bayes and maximum simulated likelihood for mixed logit, Paper presented at the Asilomar Invitational Choice Symposium, California, June.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hensher, D. A., & Greene, W. H.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • New York University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Transportation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2003-05
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
133-176
ISSN
  • 0049-4488 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9435
DOI
10.1023/a:1022558715350
OpenAlex
W1583412610
Cited by
2,047
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 118 · 2025: 144 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 126 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 98 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 110 · 2013: 122 · 2012: 101
FWCI
84.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Transportation (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
mixed logit model, discrete choice models, revealed preference data, stated choice data, model estimation, data quality, travel demand modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review