Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bacteriophage defence systems in lactic acid bacteria

Forde, Amanda, Fitzgerald, Gerald F.·1999·Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1002027321171

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • RESTRICTION AND MODIFICATION SYSTEMS

    Wilson, G. G., & Murray, N. E. (1991) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.25.120191.003101 · Cited by 714 · cited 3×

    “The severity of restriction is dependent on the system and the phage; in general the efficiency of plaquing (EOP) of the phage decreases logarithmically as the number of sites in the viral DNA molecule increases (Wilson & Murray 1991).”
    BackgroundInfluential

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Forde, A., & Fitzgerald, G. F.
Venue
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
Published
1999-11
Volume
76
Issue
1-4
Pages
89-113
ISSN
  • 0003-6072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9699
OpenAlex
W4327634737
Cited by
158
References
1
FWCI
16.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacteriophage defence systems in lactic acid bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1002027321171
The paper
Forde, A., & Fitzgerald, G. F. (1999). Bacteriophage defence systems in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1002027321171

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.