Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 73scientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetricsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Socio-Bibliometric Mapping of Intra-Departmental Networks

Mählck, Paula, Persson, Olle·2000·Scientometrics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1005661208810

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Mählck, P., & Persson, O.
Venue
Scientometrics
Published
2000-08
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
81-91
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
OpenAlex
W1750898708
Cited by
73
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
authorship networks, co-authorship networks, citation networks, academic departments, academic seniority, supervisor-student relationship, network structure, bibliometric visualization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.