Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gift Giving, Bribery and Corruption: Ethical Management of Business Relationships in China

Steidlmeier, P.·1999·Journal of Business Ethics
DOI 10.1023/a:1005960026519
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1005960026519

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Steidlmeier, P.
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1999-06
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
121-132
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
DOI
10.1023/a:1005960026519
OpenAlex
W1482929535
Cited by
280
References
12
FWCI
14.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gift Giving, Bribery and Corruption: Ethical Management of Business Relationships in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1005960026519
The paper
Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Gift Giving, Bribery and Corruption: Ethical Management of Business Relationships in China. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1005960026519

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.