Will changes in soil organic carbon act as a positive or negative feedback on global warming?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This transfer of SOC to the atmosphere is a major perturbation to the global carbon cycle.
“This transfer of SOC to the atmosphere is a major perturbation to the global carbon cycle [2]”
From Impacts of Rotational Grazing on Soil Carbon in Native Grass-Based Pastures in Southern Australia (2015) · cites this paper as [2]
Cites
Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world
BATJES, N. H. (1996) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.x · Cited by 3,213 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change
Davidson, E. A., & Janssens, I. A. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04514 · Cited by 6,919 · see citing works
Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization
Mack, M. C., Schuur, E. A. G., Bret-Harte, M. S., Shaver, G. R., & Chapin, F. S. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02887 · Cited by 1,030 · see citing works
van Hees, P. A. W., Jones, D. L., Finlay, R., Godbold, D. L., & Lundström, U. S. (2005) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.06.010 · Cited by 653 · see citing works
Bauer, J., Herbst, M., Huisman, J. A., Weihermüller, L., & Vereecken, H. (2008) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.01.026 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Effects of land cover on ecosystem services in Tanzania: A spatial assessment of soil organic carbon
Winowiecki, L., Vågen, T.-G., & Huising, J. (2016) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.03.010 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Impacts of Rotational Grazing on Soil Carbon in Native Grass-Based Pastures in Southern Australia
Sanderman, J., Reseigh, J., Wurst, M., Young, M.-A., & Austin, J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136157 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Ahirwal, J., Kumar, A., & Maiti, S. K. (2020) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min10100840 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Bauer, J., Kirschbaum, M. U. F., Weihermüller, L., Huisman, J. A., Herbst, M., & Vereecken, H. (2008) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.07.024 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Kirschbaum, M. U. F.
- Affiliations
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Kirschbaum, Miko U.F.
- Venue
- Biogeochemistry
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-51
- ISSN
- 0168-2563 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-515X
- OpenAlex
- W2150193364
- Cited by
- 793
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 47.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Biogeochemistry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Climate change and permafrost
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
- Keywords
- soil organic carbon, global warming, climate feedbacks, organic matter decomposition, net primary productivity, temperature sensitivity, soil respiration, carbon isotope ratio, Last Glacial Maximum, elevated CO2, carbon cycle, terrestrial carbon storage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
