Cited by 39Survey Methodology and NonresponseHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

Validity and reliability in reporting sexual partners and condom use in a Swiss population survey

Jeannin, André, Konings, Elke, Dubois-Arber, Françoise, Landert, Charles, Van Melle, Guy·1998·European Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Objectives To examine the validity and reliability of indicators of sexual behaviour and condom use in annual telephone surveys (n=2800) of the general population aged 17 to 45 for the evaluation of AIDS prevention in Switzerland. Methods A test-retest study with additional focused interviews was conducted on a subsample (n=138) of the respondents aged 17 to 22 years. Results The subsample included more French speaking respondents (OR: 1.7, CI: 1.1-2.5) and more people in a stable relationship (OR: 2.2, CI: 1.5-3-3) than the initial sample but did not differ in any other way, although no data is available on their attitudes towards sex. The reliability of the indicators considered was high: number of lifetime, casual sex partners in the last 6 months and condom use with them, acquisition of a new steady partner during the year and condom use with this partner, condom use at last intercourse. However, the focused interviews raised questions about the validity of some of these indicators, presumably due to imprecise wording of the questionnaire items. Among sexually active respondents, 12.5% (95% CI: 4.7-25.5) of the men included non-penetrative sex in the definition of 'sexual intercourse', but only 1.9% (95% CI: 0.1-10.3) of the women. The propensity for men of counting acts or partners with whom no penetration had taken place in the total reported sex acts or partners was not significantly associated with any socio-demographic variables. In addition, among the 15 respondents who had reported consistent condom use with casual sex partners at interview, 40% (95% CI: 16.3-67.7) admitted at reinterview that sometimes they also had unprotected sex. Conclusions The reliability of reports on sexual behaviour and condom use in this Swiss evaluation survey is good. The indicators derived from the annual surveys are robust measures and the monitoring of trends seems to be based on reliable measurement. However, more research is required on the validity of the data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1007435824281

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeannin, A., Konings, E., Dubois-Arber, F., Landert, C., & Van Melle, G.
Affiliations
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (CH)
Venue
European Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1998-02
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
139-146
ISSN
  • 0393-2990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7284
OpenAlex
W1577313450
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
sexual behavior, condom use, sexual partners, measurement validity, measurement reliability, questionnaire wording, casual sex, steady partners, unprotected sex, HIV prevention, young adults
MeSH terms
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Switzerland, Telephone, Reproducibility of Results, Confidence Intervals, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Condoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review