CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 39Survey Methodology and NonresponseHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Validity and reliability in reporting sexual partners and condom use in a Swiss population survey

Jeannin, André, Konings, Elke, Dubois-Arber, Françoise, Landert, Charles, Van Melle, Guy·1998·European Journal of Epidemiology
DOI 10.1023/a:1007435824281
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives To examine the validity and reliability of indicators of sexual behaviour and condom use in annual telephone surveys (n=2800) of the general population aged 17 to 45 for the evaluation of AIDS prevention in Switzerland. Methods A test-retest study with additional focused interviews was conducted on a subsample (n=138) of the respondents aged 17 to 22 years. Results The subsample included more French speaking respondents (OR: 1.7, CI: 1.1-2.5) and more people in a stable relationship (OR: 2.2, CI: 1.5-3-3) than the initial sample but did not differ in any other way, although no data is available on their attitudes towards sex. The reliability of the indicators considered was high: number of lifetime, casual sex partners in the last 6 months and condom use with them, acquisition of a new steady partner during the year and condom use with this partner, condom use at last intercourse. However, the focused interviews raised questions about the validity of some of these indicators, presumably due to imprecise wording of the questionnaire items. Among sexually active respondents, 12.5% (95% CI: 4.7-25.5) of the men included non-penetrative sex in the definition of 'sexual intercourse', but only 1.9% (95% CI: 0.1-10.3) of the women. The propensity for men of counting acts or partners with whom no penetration had taken place in the total reported sex acts or partners was not significantly associated with any socio-demographic variables. In addition, among the 15 respondents who had reported consistent condom use with casual sex partners at interview, 40% (95% CI: 16.3-67.7) admitted at reinterview that sometimes they also had unprotected sex. Conclusions The reliability of reports on sexual behaviour and condom use in this Swiss evaluation survey is good. The indicators derived from the annual surveys are robust measures and the monitoring of trends seems to be based on reliable measurement. However, more research is required on the validity of the data.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1007435824281

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Office fédéral de la santé publique. VIH et sida en Suisse jusqu'à la fin de 1994. Bulletin de l'OFSP 1995(3): 4–9.
  2. WHO-EC Collaborating Centre on AIDS. AIDS surveillance in Europe. Quarterly report No 43, 30 September 1994. Saint-Maurice, France, 1994.
  3. Hausser D, Dubois-Arber F, Zimmermann E. Assessing AIDS prevention in Switzerland. In: Paccaud F, Vader JP, Gutzwiller F (eds), Assessing AIDS prevention. Basel: Birkhauser, 1992:116–122. · DOI
  4. Dubois-Arber F, Jeannin A, Meystre-Agustoni G, Gruet F, Paccaud F. Evaluation of the AIDS prevention strategy in Switzerland. Lausanne, Switzerland: Cah Rech DOC IUMSP No 82b, 1993.
  5. Jeannin A, Dubois-Arber F, Paccaud F. HIV Testing in Switzerland. AIDS 1994; 8:1599–1603. · DOI
  6. Mertens T, Caraël M, Sato P, Cleland J, Ward H, Smith GD. Prevention indicators for evaluating the progress of national AIDS programmes. AIDS 1994; 8: 1359–1369. · DOI
  7. Slutkin G. The evaluation of prevention efforts in national AIDS programmes. In: Paccaud F, Vader JP, Gutzwiller F (eds), Assessing AIDS prevention. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag, 1992: 3–14. · DOI
  8. Catania JA, Gibson DR, Chitwood DD, Coates TJ. Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: Influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psycho] Bull 1990;108(3): 339–362. · DOI
  9. Boulton M. The methodological imagination. In: Boulton M (ed), Challenge an innovation: Methodological advances in social research on HIV/AIDS. London: Taylor & Francis, 1994:1–21.
  10. Konings E, Blattner WA, Levin A, Brubaker G, Siso Z, Shao J, et al. Sexual behaviour survey in a rural area of northwest Tanzania. AIDS 1994; 8: 987–993. · DOI
  11. Konings E, Bantebya G, Carael M. Bagenda D, Mertens T. Validating population surveys for the measurement of HIV/STD prevention indicators. AIDS 1995; 9: 375–382. · DOI
  12. Leridon H. La fréquence des rapports sexuels. Données et analyses de coherence. Population 1993; 5:1381–1408.
  13. Riandey B, Firdion Jean-M. Vie personnelle et enquête téléphonique. L'exemple de l'enquête ACSF. Population 1993; 5:1257–1280. · DOI
  14. Shea S, Stein AD, Lantigua R, Basch CE. Reliability of the behavioral risk factor survey in a triethnic population. Amer J Epidemiol 1991; 133: 489–500. · DOI
  15. Stein AD, Lederman RI, Shea S. The behavioral risk factor surveillance system questionnaire: Reliability in a statewide sample. Am J Public Health 1993; 83(12): 1768–1772. · DOI
  16. Davis PB, Yee RL, Chetwynd J, McMillan N. The New Zealand partner relations survey: Methodological results of a national telephone survey. AIDS 1993; 7:1509–1516. · DOI
  17. Brener ND, Collins JL, Kann L, Warren CW, Williams BI. Reliability of the youth risk behavior survey questionnaire. Amer J Epidemiol 1995; 141: 575–580. · DOI
  18. Groves RM. Research on survey data quality. POQ 1987; 51: S156-S172. · DOI
  19. Groves RM. Theories and methods of telephone surveys. Annu Rev Sociol 1990; 16: 221–240. · DOI
  20. Dijkstra W, van der Zouwen J, eds. Response behaviour in the survey interview. London: Academic Press, 1982.
  21. Hogarth RM, ed. Question framing and response consistency. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982 (New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science; Number 11, March 1982).
  22. Schuman H, Presser S. Questions & answers in attitude surveys. Experiments on question form, wording and context. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
  23. Bradburn NM. Response Effects. In: Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB (eds), Handbook of survey research. New York: Academic Press. 1983: 289–328. · DOI
  24. Fiske DW ed. Problems with language imprecision. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981 (New directions for meth-odology of social and behavioral science; Number 9, September 1981).
  25. Office fédéral de la santé publique, Commission fédérale pour les problèmes liés au SIDA. Prévention du VIH en Suisse. Buts, stratégies, mesures. Berne: Office fédéral de la santé publique, 1993.
  26. ASCF principal investigators and their associates. Analysis of sexual behaviour in France (ACSF). A comparison between two modes of investigation: Telephone survey and face-to-face survey. AIDS 1992; 6: 315–323.
  27. Groves RM, Kahn RL. Surveys by telephone. A national comparison with personal interviews. New York: Academic Press, 1979.
  28. Messiah A, Blin P, Fiche V ACSF group. Sexual repertoire of heterosexuals: Implications for HIV/sexually transmitted disease risk and prevention. AIDS 1995; 9: 1357–1365. · DOI
  29. Wellings K, Field J, Johnson AM, Wadsworth J. Sexual behaviour in Britain. The national survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles. London: Penguin Books, 1994.
  30. ACSF Investigators. AIDS and sexual behaviour in France. Nature 1992 December 3; 360: 407–409. · DOI
  31. Johnson AM, Wadsworth KW, Bradshaw S, Field J. Sexual Lifestyles and HIV Risk. Nature 1992 December; 360:410–412. · DOI
  32. Fife-Schaw CR, Breakwell GM. Estimating sexual behaviour parameters in the light of AIDS: A review of recent UK studies of young people. AIDS Care 1992; 4(2):187–201. · DOI
  33. Traeen B, Lewin B, Sundet JM. The real and the ideal: Gender differences in heterosexual behaviour among Norwegian adolescents. J Commun Appl Soc Psychol 1992; 2:227–237. · DOI
  34. Robertson BJ. Sexual behaviour and risk exposure to HIV among 18–25-years-olds in Scotland: Assessing change 1988-1993. AIDS 1995; 9: 285-292. · DOI
  35. Carael M, Cleland J, Deheneffe JC, Ferry B, Ingham R. Sexual behaviour in developing countries: Implications for HIV control. AIDS 1995; 9:1171–1175. · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Jeannin, A., Konings, E., Dubois-Arber, F., Landert, C., & Van Melle, G.
Affiliations
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (CH)
Venue
European Journal of Epidemiology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1998-02
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
139-146
ISSN
  • 0393-2990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7284
DOI
10.1023/a:1007435824281
OpenAlex
W1577313450
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • European Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
sexual behavior, condom use, sexual partners, measurement validity, measurement reliability, questionnaire wording, casual sex, steady partners, unprotected sex, HIV prevention, young adults
MeSH terms
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Switzerland, Telephone, Reproducibility of Results, Confidence Intervals, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Condoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review