The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Contingent Valuation of Safety and the Safety of Contingent Valuation: Part 1-Caveat Investigator
Abstract
This article reports the results of two studies aimed at testing and refining a procedure for estimating willingness-to-pay based monetary values of safety using the contingent valuation method. In spite of the fact that respondents were given the opportunity to discuss various safety issues and key concepts in focus group meetings held in advance of individual interviews, and were also given ample opportunity to revise their responses in the light of the overall pattern of these responses, the results show clear evidence of extensive and persistent insensitivity to the scale and scope of the safety improvements that were specified in the contingent valuation questions, as well as vulnerability to framing effects. This clearly casts serious doubt on the reliability and validity of willingness-to-pay based monetary values of safety estimated using conventional contingent valuation procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Contingent Valuation: A User's Guide
Carson, R. T. (2000) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es990728j · Cited by 831
The value of statistical life in road safety: a meta-analysis
de Blaeij, A., Florax, R. J. G. M., Rietveld, P., & Verhoef, E. (2003) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00105-7 · Cited by 293
Are some lives more valuable? An ethical preferences approach
Johansson-Stenman, O., & Martinsson, P. (2008) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.10.001 · Cited by 64
Preferences for lives, injuries, and age: A stated preference survey
Carlsson, F., Daruvala, D., & Jaldell, H. (2010) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.002 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- BEATTIE*, J., COVEY, J., DOLAN, P., HOPKINS, L., JONES-LEE, M., LOOMES, G., PIDGEON, N., ROBINSON, A., & SPENCER, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-26
- ISSN
- 0895-5646 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0476
- OpenAlex
- W2102953515
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Contingent Valuation of Safety and the Safety of Contingent Valuation: Part 1-Caveat Investigator. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1007711416843
- The paper
- BEATTIE*, J., COVEY, J., DOLAN, P., HOPKINS, L., JONES-LEE, M., LOOMES, G., PIDGEON, N., ROBINSON, A., & SPENCER, A. (1998). On the Contingent Valuation of Safety and the Safety of Contingent Valuation: Part 1-Caveat Investigator. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1007711416843
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.