The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reactive Modules
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Probabilistic symbolic model checking with PRISM: a hybrid approach
Kwiatkowska, M., Norman, G., & Parker, D. (2004) · International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10009-004-0140-2 · Cited by 435
Modeling formalisms in Systems Biology
Machado, D., Costa, R. S., Rocha, M., Ferreira, E. C., Tidor, B., & Rocha, I. (2011) · AMB Express · doi:10.1186/2191-0855-1-45 · Cited by 189
Towards formal verification of IoT protocols: A Review
Hofer-Schmitz, K., & Stojanović, B. (2020) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107233 · Cited by 104
A quantitative framework for layered multirate control: Toward a theory of control architecture
Matni, N., Ames, A. D., & Doyle, J. C. (2024) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2024.3382388 · Cited by 39
Synthesis of biological models from mutation experiments
Koksal, A. S., Pu, Y., Srivastava, S., Bodik, R., Fisher, J., & Piterman, N. (2013) · Proceedings of the 40th annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages · doi:10.1145/2429069.2429125 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Alur, R., & Henzinger, T. A.
- Venue
- Formal Methods in System Design
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-48
- ISSN
- 0925-9856 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8102
- OpenAlex
- W2912904668
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reactive Modules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1008739929481
- The paper
- Alur, R., & Henzinger, T. A. (1999). Reactive Modules. Formal Methods in System Design. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1008739929481
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
