The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pregnancy Intention: How PRAMS Data Can Inform Programs and Policy
Abstract
Background In most states, the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) is the only source for state-specific, population-based data on the prevalence of unintended pregnancy among women having a live birth. These data can be used in a variety of ways to inform state policies and programs aimed at the prevention of unintended pregnancy. Objectives This paper highlights the programmatic and policy development activities undertaken by three states in relation to unintended pregnancy as well as the role that PRAMS data played in those efforts. Results Georgia, Oklahoma, and Washington have used PRAMS data to gain support for program initiatives directed at unintended pregnancy, to promote policies aimed at either monitoring or reducing unintended pregnancy, and to acquire additional funds for related programs, such as family planning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Geographical variation in women's rates of unintended pregnancy as linked to variation in state policies re family planning19”
From Genders, sexes, and health: what are the connections—and why does it matter? (2003) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect 1998:30(1);4–26, 46. · DOI
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Public Health and Science. Healthy People 2010 objectives: Draft for public comment. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1998.
- Adams MM, Shulman HB, Bruce C, Hogue C, Brogan D, PRAMS Working Group. The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System: Design, questionnaire, data collection and response rates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1991;5:333–46. · DOI
- Colley Gilbert B, Shulman HB, Fischer LA, Rogers MM. The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): Methods and 1996 response rates from 11 states. Matern Child Health J 1999;3(4):199–209. · DOI
- Colley Gilbert BJ, Johnson C, Morrow B, Gaffield M, Ahluwalia I, PRAMS Working Group. Prevalence of selected maternal and infant characteristics, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 1997. MMWR 1999;48:SS–5.
- Georgia Department of Human Resources, Division of Public Health, Family Health Branch, Office of Adolescent Health and Development. Fact sheet: Office of Adolescent Health and Youth Development. Atlanta: Georgia Department of Human Resources, 1999.
- Hopkins RS, Marshall H, Hoecherl S. Medicaid costs of live births from unintended pregnancies in Florida. J Fla Med Assoc 1995:82;540–3.
- Committee on Unintended Pregnancy, Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences. The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995.
Cited by
Genders, sexes, and health: what are the connections—and why does it matter?
Krieger, N. (2003) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyg156 · Cited by 788
Metadata
- Authors
- Melvin, C. L., Rogers, M., Gilbert, B. C., Lipscomb, L., Lorenz, R., Ronck, S., & Casey, S.
- Affiliations
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
- Oklahoma State Department of Health (US)
- Washington State Department of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Melvin, Cathy L.
- Venue
- Maternal and Child Health Journal
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 197-201
- ISSN
- 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6628
- OpenAlex
- W2578361877
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, unintended pregnancy, pregnancy intention, unintended pregnancy prevention, family planning, state health policy, program development, Georgia, Oklahoma, Washington
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Education, Family Planning Services, Female, Georgia, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Oklahoma, Pregnancy, Pregnancy in Adolescence, Surveys and Questionnaires, Washington
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pregnancy Intention: How PRAMS Data Can Inform Programs and Policy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1009579615114
- The paper
- Melvin, C. L., Rogers, M., Gilbert, B. C., Lipscomb, L., Lorenz, R., Ronck, S., & Casey, S. (2000). Pregnancy Intention: How PRAMS Data Can Inform Programs and Policy. Maternal and Child Health Journal. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1009579615114